Derivative Proof: Prove f'(x)=lim x→0 (f(x+h)-f(x-h))/2h

  • Thread starter Thread starter v0id19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit definition of the derivative, specifically showing that if the derivative \( f' \) is continuous, then \( \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x+h) - f(x-h)}{2h} = f'(x) \). The context is within an AP Calculus BC framework, where participants are exploring the implications of continuity on derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss manipulating the difference quotient and consider the implications of continuity. There are questions about the correct limit variable and suggestions to apply limit lemmas. Some participants explore the relationship between the limit as \( h \) approaches 0 and the limit as \( x \) approaches 0.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various approaches being suggested. Some participants are questioning the original problem statement regarding the limits, while others are providing insights into potential methods for proving the statement. There is a recognition that continuity plays a crucial role in the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding whether the limit should be taken as \( x \to 0 \) or \( h \to 0 \), which has implications for the approach to the problem. Additionally, the original poster mentions a potential error in the problem as stated by their teacher.

v0id19
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if f' is continuous, show that:
\mathop{\lim}\limits_{x \to 0}(\frac{f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{2h})=f'(x)
be sure to explain why f' must be continuous

Homework Equations


not really any equations, this is for AP Calc BC and we've just done L'Hospital's theorem and the derivatives/integrals of logs and inverse trig functions.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that as x-->0 it becomes \frac{f(h)-f(-h)}{2h} . I thought about proving that the difference quotient can be manipulated into the above formula, but haven't had any success.

Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you certain that it's supposed to be as x -> 0 and not h? Aside from that, my only suggestion is to add and subtract f(x)/2h and apply some limit lemmas.
 
yeah it says x-->0
what is a 'limit lemma'? o.O
 
I think jgens is right, it's likely h -> 0.

Hmmm, I'm surprised this is Calc BC. I think I've seen this problem in Spivak before.

The trick is to consider the difference quotient and replace h with -h, and then take the limit as h -> 0. Then you should be able to work with the expression given.

EDIT: Ok, this is a slightly different problem. Hmmm, see if you can make use of the definition of continuity, and the equivalence of the statements lim x -> a f(x) and lim h -> 0 f(a+h).
 
Last edited:
I think this approach may work:

Derivative of a function: y = f(x) than y - dy = f(x - h), hence dy/dx = lim h -> 0 (f(x) - f(x - h))/h

Given (f(x + h) - f(x - h))/2h = (f(x +h) - f(x) + f(x) - f(x - h))/2h. Take the limit as h -> 0 and I think that should yield a solution.

A limit lemma would be lim x-> c kf(x) = klim x -> c f(x) where k is a constant.
 
thanks i'll give that a try--my only question is how do i get it from x-->0 to h-->0?
 
So it turns out my math teacher actually did write the question wrong... it really is h-->0. it's solved with a simple l'hospital. thanks guys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K