Derivatives and Integrals of units

AI Thread Summary
Calculating derivatives and integrals of units in physics involves understanding how units behave during these operations. When differentiating a unit of displacement with respect to time, the resulting unit is displacement per time, reflecting the rate of change. Conversely, integrating a force with respect to displacement results in a unit that combines force and displacement. The differentiation process effectively divides the units, while integration multiplies them. This foundational understanding is crucial for ensuring correct unit manipulation in physics problems.
Dougggggg
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
I couldn't decide whether to place this in the Physics or the Math section of the forums, deep down it is really a Math question for Physics problems. So mods please move if you feel it would be more appropriate in the Physics section.

So when doing calculations, I always like to make sure my units are behaving correctly. That I am not adding kg to m/s or something weird like that. One thing that I haven't really thought about how it applies is doing calculus type manipulation of units. Like if I take the derivative of a unit of displacement, with respect to a unit of time, I get a unit of displacement over time.

For Integrals if I take a integral of force, with respect to displacement, I get a unit of force times displacement.

Basically, what is the basic method to these kind of things?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is exactly as you say.
When you differentiate with respect to x, the units get a factor of 1/[x] (where [x] are x's units).
When you integrate with respect to x, the units get a factor of [x].
For differentiation, this follows simply from the definition, because f'(x) is a limit of the quotient
\frac{\Delta f(x)}{\Delta x}
which has units
\frac{[\Delta f(x)]}{[\Delta x]} = \frac{[f(x)]}{[x]}.

For integration, simply reverse the argument, i.e. something along the lines of
\left[ \frac{d}{dx} \left( \int f(x) \, dx \right) \right] = [ f(x) ]
but it is also
\left[\int f(x) \, dx \right] / [x]
therefore,
\left[ \int f(x) \, dx \right] = [f(x)] [x].
 
Think of differentiation as being an extension of division and integration as an extension of multiplication.

The units of dy/dx are the units of y divided by the units of x. For example, if y is measured in meters and x is measured in seconds then dy/dx (the rate of change of y with respect to x= rate of change of distance with respect to time) has units of "meters per second".

The units of \int f(x) dx are the units of f(x) times the units of dx (which are the same as the units of x). For example, if f(x) is a "linear mass density" in "kilograms per meter" and x has units of meters, then \int f(x)dx has units of (kilogram/meter)(meter)= kilogram.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top