Derivatives in polar coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the derivative (dz/dx) in polar coordinates for a function z = z(r, θ). The correct formula, as referenced from "Steiner - The Chemistry Maths Book," is (dz/dx) = (dz/dr)cos(θ) - sin(θ)(1/r)(dz/dθ). The user initially struggled with evaluating (dr/dx) and (dθ/dx) but later realized that r can be expressed as sqrt(x² + y²) and θ as arctan(y/x), simplifying the problem significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their relationship to Cartesian coordinates.
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their notation.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically cosine and sine.
  • Basic calculus concepts, including the chain rule and implicit differentiation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of derivatives in polar coordinates using examples.
  • Learn about the chain rule in the context of multivariable calculus.
  • Explore the implications of expressing polar coordinates in terms of Cartesian coordinates.
  • Review implicit differentiation techniques for functions of multiple variables.
USEFUL FOR

Students and self-learners in calculus, particularly those interested in understanding derivatives in polar coordinates, as well as educators looking for examples to illustrate these concepts.

JustAChemist
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I appologise in the lack of distinction between curly d's and infinitesimals! All derivatives are partial and anything outside of brackets is an infinitesimal.

also, I sincerely apologise for any dodgy terminology, but I am for the most part self taught (regarding calculus) :/

(also, 0 is my poor attempt to represent theta :P)

Homework Statement



More my obsessive compulsiveness when it's really something I'm just supposed to remember, but here goes...

Express (dz/dx) in polar coordinates for some arbitrary z = z(r, 0)

Homework Equations



the answer given by my book (Steiner - The Chemistry Maths Book):

(dz/dx) = (dz/dr)cos(0) - sin(theta)(1/r)(dz/d0)

The Attempt at a Solution



dz = (dz/dr)dr + (dz/d0)d0

(dz/dx) = (dz/dr)(dr/dx) + (dz/d0)(d0/dx)

essentially, my problem is in evaluating (dr/dx) and (d0/dx) (0 is theta)

ATTEMPT AT EVALUATING (dr/dx)

x = r cos(0) => r = x/cos(0)

=> (dr/dx) = 1/cos(0)

which is... wrong :/. I've also tried so much more silly sh*t like implicit differentiation, and inverting dx/dr, always arriving at the same answer ):

ATTEMPT AT EVAUATING (d0/dx)

x = r cos(0) => 0 = arccos(x/r)

and I have no idea how to start evaluating that...
Any help anyone could give would be greatly appreciated! (:

EDIT:

I am an idiot... after 3 days of ploughing through with this and 10 minutes typing the problem to physicsforums, I just worked out that r can be represented in terms of x and y as sqrt(x^2 + y^2) and theta as arctan(y/x)... the rest writes itself lol :P

I hate my life. :P
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JustAChemist said:
I appologise in the lack of distinction between curly d's and infinitesimals! All derivatives are partial and anything outside of brackets is an infinitesimal.

also, I sincerely apologise for any dodgy terminology, but I am for the most part self taught (regarding calculus) :/

(also, 0 is my poor attempt to represent theta :P)

Homework Statement



More my obsessive compulsiveness when it's really something I'm just supposed to remember, but here goes...

Express (dz/dx) in polar coordinates for some arbitrary z = z(r, 0)

Homework Equations



the answer given by my book (Steiner - The Chemistry Maths Book):

(dz/dx) = (dz/dr)cos(0) - sin(theta)(1/r)(dz/d0)

The Attempt at a Solution



dz = (dz/dr)dr + (dz/d0)d0

(dz/dx) = (dz/dr)(dr/dx) + (dz/d0)(d0/dx)

essentially, my problem is in evaluating (dr/dx) and (d0/dx) (0 is theta)

ATTEMPT AT EVALUATING (dr/dx)

x = r cos(0) => r = x/cos(0)

=> (dr/dx) = 1/cos(0)

good that you've got it now, and sounds like a much easier method, but just to point out the reason this fell over, is becauser theta is a function of x & y also,
so you must consider 0(x,y) when you take the derivative w.r.t. x
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K