Derivatives in relation to physics

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of applying derivatives in calculus-based physics, particularly in calculating angular velocity and acceleration. The user struggles with understanding how to differentiate the angular displacement equation θ = 0.11t² to find angular velocity (ω) and angular acceleration (α). Clarifications are provided that the derivative dθ/dt should be evaluated as 0.22t, and angular acceleration is defined as the change in angular velocity over time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of mastering calculus concepts to effectively tackle physics problems. A recommendation is made to review calculus fundamentals for better comprehension.
SadPanda6022
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
OK, I have never had physics till this semester and I am in calculus based physics and it is kicking my butt.

I don't understand how derivatives are properly used in the formulas, and I have an example, my question is the image attached.

@=theta
A=alpha

SO,
A) I need omega (angular velocity). w= d@/dt right? so if @=0.11(4.9)^2, plugged into that equation...
we end up with:
w=d(0.11*4.9^2)/d(4.9)
w=0.11(2)(4.9)/1=1.08 rad/s, <------this is right I think.

B) got it: v=rw, no sweat, v=10.8m/s

C) Here is where I trip up. According to my understanding, A=dw/dt, which means d(1.08)/d(4.9)...

but that's not right, derivatives of constants=0...I don't understand. It's been a while since I took calculus, so am I just messing something dumb up?
 

Attachments

  • phys2dervtve.jpg
    phys2dervtve.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 424
Physics news on Phys.org
and to boot, the formula for omega(w) is just listed as w=@/t, which gives me 0.539 rad/s.

and neither 0.539rad/s OR 1.08rad/s is correct. grrrrrrrrrrr
 
is it because they are differential change of @ and t? sooooo, its actually d((0.11*t^2)-0)/d(4.9-0) so the differential just takes the 0 away?

...no that isn't right.
 
SadPanda6022 said:
OK, I have never had physics till this semester and I am in calculus based physics and it is kicking my butt.

I don't understand how derivatives are properly used in the formulas, and I have an example, my question is the image attached.

@=theta
A=alpha

SO,
A) I need omega (angular velocity). w= d@/dt right? so if @=0.11(4.9)^2, plugged into that equation...
we end up with:
w=d(0.11*4.9^2)/d(4.9)
w=0.11(2)(4.9)/1=1.08 rad/s, <------this is right I think.

B) got it: v=rw, no sweat, v=10.8m/s

C) Here is where I trip up. According to my understanding, A=dw/dt, which means d(1.08)/d(4.9)...
but that's not right, derivatives of constants=0...I don't understand. It's been a while since I took calculus, so am I just messing something dumb up?
Maybe you should refresh your knowledge of calculus before trying to apply it to physics.

Back to the problem at hand:

θ = 0.11 t2

If you want to find the angular velocity ω = dθ / dt, then differentiate the expression for θ with respect to t first, before plugging in any values for t.

https://www.mathsisfun.com/calculus/derivatives-rules.html

What you wrote, w=d(0.11*4.9^2)/d(4.9), made no sense whatsoever. The derivative, dθ / dt, does not mean substitute the expression for θ, the value for t, and cancel out the d's. It means something altogether different.
 
So it is in leibniz notation, that explains a lot of the issues I am having.

So Id I write it this way, I end up with d/dt (0.112t) = 1.08 @ t=4.9sbut regardless, I still don't understand when I find angular acceleration why it is the dw/dt when to get the answer I don't take a derivative anywhere. I just divide w by t. Is it because it is actually the second derivative of d@/dt so I end up with 0.11(2) =0.22 which is the answer...yuuup

Please excuse my inabilities with leibniz, My professor stuck to Newton notation, with y dots or f'(x). He touched on leibniz notation, but I never quite understood it. Since I hadn't planned on going further I didn't bother to pick it up. I will have to remedy that as it evidently starting to cause me problems.
 
I guess my issue here is, how do I know when I am using an equation what level of derivative I am actually at? Is it just something I have to know?
 
You need to go back and review calculus. These are all math issues that you're asking about, not Physics. These are typical homework problems covered in a calculus course.

Chet
 
SadPanda6022 said:
So it is in leibniz notation, that explains a lot of the issues I am having.

So Id I write it this way, I end up with d/dt (0.112t) = 1.08 @ t=4.9s

No, that's still not correct.

If θ =0.11 t2, then dθ / dt = 2 * 0.11 * t = 0.22 t, for all values of t.

If you want to find the value of the angular velocity at a particular time t0, then dθ / dt = 0.22 t is evaluated by setting t = t0, thus

At t0 =4.9 s, dθ / dt = 0.22 * 4.9 = 1.08 rad/sec = angular velocity @ t = 4.9 sec

but regardless, I still don't understand when I find angular acceleration why it is the dw/dt when to get the answer I don't take a derivative anywhere. I just divide w by t. Is it because it is actually the second derivative of d@/dt so I end up with 0.11(2) =0.22 which is the answer...yuuup

The angular acceleration is defined as the change of angular velocity with respect to time. Since angular velocity = dθ / dt = ω, then angular acceleration α = dω / dt.
For this particular example, ω = 0.22 t, so α = 0.22 rad / sec2, which is a constant value for any time t = t0.
Please excuse my inabilities with leibniz, My professor stuck to Newton notation, with y dots or f'(x). He touched on leibniz notation, but I never quite understood it. Since I hadn't planned on going further I didn't bother to pick it up. I will have to remedy that as it evidently starting to cause me problems.

The two forms of derivative notation are slightly different, but the concepts are the same:

## dθ / dt = \dot{θ} ##
## dω / dt = \dot{ω} = \ddot{θ} ##

Each dot above a variable indicates differentiation with respect to time. More than one dot indicates a higher-order time derivative.

As Chet indicated above, your problem is with calculus, rather than physics. Spend some time learning (or re-learning) the calculus, and then come back to the physics.
 
Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
916
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K