Deriving Calculus of Variations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the calculus of variations, specifically the differentiation of an integral function with respect to the parameter alpha. The user encounters a discrepancy between their derived expression for df/dalpha and the textbook's solution. The correct formulation involves recognizing that the function f is defined over an interval of values for Y, rather than a single value, which invalidates the user's use of the partial derivative notation. The key takeaway is that the calculus of variations requires careful attention to the definitions of functions and their dependencies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, particularly differentiation and the chain rule.
  • Familiarity with the calculus of variations and its fundamental principles.
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, specifically integrals of functions of multiple variables.
  • Experience with partial derivatives and their notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation in the calculus of variations.
  • Learn about the implications of function dependencies in variational problems.
  • Explore examples of minimizing functionals in the calculus of variations.
  • Review the notation and interpretation of partial derivatives in multivariable calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, physics, or engineering, who are looking to deepen their understanding of the calculus of variations and its applications.

cooev769
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Hey I'm having an issue deriving the calculus of variations because the chain rule i use ends up different to the one in the textbook. Firstly I assume we have some function of 3 variables Y=y+alpha eta with grad Y'=y'+alpha eta' and x. Secondly we have an integral of this function over x and want to minimise it, hence we want to differentiate with respect to alpha, and hence we need to use the chain rule. For me I end up with, and these d's are partial derivatives not normal:

df/dalpha = df/dY * eta + df/dY' eta'

But the textbook says the answer is with small y's instead of big and the rest of the class says that the book is correct and can't explain to me why, can anybody please enlighten me?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cooev769 said:
Secondly we have an integral of this function over x
and want to minimise it, hence we want to differentiate with respect to alpha, and hence we need to use the chain rule. For me I end up with, and these d's are partial derivatives not normal:
df/dalpha = df/dY * eta + df/dY' eta'

What is f ?

In the usual introduction to the calculus of variations, the problem can be stated as:
Minimize G(\alpha) = \int_a^b f(y,y',x) dx where y = y(x,\alpha) is a function of x and \alpha.

Are you are using the notation f(\alpha) = \int_a^b Y(y,y',x) dx?

if so, f is not a function of Y. A single value for Y does no determine a value for f. The function f is determined by an entire interval of vales for Y. So the symbol \frac{\partial f}{\partial Y} doesn't mean anything.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K