Deriving d'Alemberts solution - Boundary conditions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving d'Alembert's solution for the wave equation using Fourier transforms. The solution is established as u(x,t) = (f(x+t) + f(x-t))/2, with initial conditions u(x,0) = f(x) and u_t(x,0) = 0. The participant successfully navigates the Fourier transform process, identifying the relationship between the constants A and B, concluding that A(s) = B(s) and both equal f(x)/2 when applying the boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and their mathematical formulation
  • Proficiency in Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Knowledge of initial and boundary conditions in differential equations
  • Familiarity with complex exponentials and their applications in solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the wave equation and its general solutions
  • Learn about Fourier transform techniques in solving partial differential equations
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions on solutions of differential equations
  • Investigate the role of complex analysis in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on wave phenomena, as well as anyone interested in advanced techniques for solving partial differential equations.

divB
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I shall show (using Fourier transform) that the solution to

[tex] \frac{\partial^2 u(x,t)}{\partial t^2} = \frac{\partial^2 u(x,t)}{\partial x^2}\\<br /> u(x,0) = f(x) \\<br /> u_t(x,0) = 0[/tex]

is

[tex] u(x,t) = (f(x+t) + f(x-t))/2[/tex]

I got it almost: Taking the Fourier transform in the variable x (leaving t constant) and the derivative theorem gives:

[tex] \hat{u}_{tt}(s,t) + 4\pi^2 s^2 \hat{u}(s,t) = 0[/tex]

And the solution to this differential equation is:

[tex] \hat{u}(s,t) = A e^{j2\pi s t} + B e^{-j2\pi s t}[/tex]

However, now I am stuck in incorporating the boundary conditions and I do not see why A and B should become [itex]f(x)=u(x,0)[/itex].

My approach was: Since u(x,t) was transferred to Fourier domain via x rather than t, [itex]u(s,0) = \hat{u}(x,0)[/itex]. Derivating the solution for t and filling t=0 gives A=B. But I neither see the factor of 1/2 there, nore why A and B should be f(x). Can anyone give me a pointer?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Got it; finally!
It is so trivial from where I was: A=B was correct, it is a constant regarding t but not s, so A(s)=B(s).

The other "boundary" condition is u(x,0)=f(x), so when transforming back my solution: u(x,t) = A(x+t)+B(x-t) with t=0: u(x,0)=A(x)+B(x) which means that A(x)=B(x)=f(x)/2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K