I'm trying to linearize Klein-Gordon equation, following Dirac's nobel lecture:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex](E^2 - (pc)^2 - (mc^2)^2) \psi = 0[/tex]

[tex](E + \alpha pc + \beta mc^2) (E + \alpha pc - \beta mc^2) \psi = 0[/tex]

Expanding the equations yields:

-[tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\beta[/tex] commutes with E and p

-[tex]\alpha^2 = \beta^2 = 1[/tex]

-[tex]\alpha \beta + \beta \alpha = 0[/tex]

I have been trying solve for [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\beta[/tex]. I tried this: I assume that both a 2x2 matrices, each element being a matrix. Then I had 12 equations. I doubt 12 equations is sufficient to solve a non-linear equation system of 8 unknown matrices.

I tried looking at several QFT books, and all had what [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\beta[/tex] are, coming out of air. I haven't found the solution anywhere yet :grumpy:

Anyone willing to point a path?

----

note to the guy who's moving my threads to homework forum: this's again not a homework question. i'd post it to homework forum if it was a homework question. and as far i know, not every physical question that involves mathematics means it's a homework.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Deriving Dirac matrices

Loading...

Similar Threads for Deriving Dirac matrices | Date |
---|---|

I Deriving resolution of the identity without Dirac notation | Apr 18, 2017 |

Derivation of Fermi-Dirac distribution | Nov 5, 2015 |

Deriving the dirac equation | Jan 30, 2013 |

Trying to Derive Dirac's equation following Dirac | Jan 27, 2013 |

Note to the derivation of Dirac equation | Apr 23, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**