Deriving EM Energy Conservation from Lagrangian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving energy conservation for electromagnetic fields with currents using the action principle. The Lagrangian density is expressed as $$\mathcal{L}(x^\alpha, A_\alpha, \partial_\beta A_\alpha) = -\frac {1} {4\mu_0}F^{\alpha \beta}F_{\alpha \beta} - A_\alpha J^\alpha$$, leading to Maxwell's equations. The challenge arises from the dependence of the current density ##J^\alpha(x)## on space-time coordinates, which disrupts time translational symmetry and complicates energy conservation derivation. The conversation highlights the need for a Lagrangian that accounts for the evolution of both ##A_\alpha## and ##J^\alpha##, referencing the Belinfante energy-momentum tensor for a comprehensive understanding of energy-momentum balance in electromagnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the action principle
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field theory and Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of energy-momentum tensors, specifically the Belinfante energy-momentum tensor
  • Basic concepts of differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Belinfante energy-momentum tensor in detail
  • Explore the relationship between gauge invariance and energy-momentum conservation
  • Learn about the variational principles in mechanics, focusing on their application to electromagnetic fields
  • Investigate advanced topics in differential geometry relevant to field theories
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers interested in electromagnetic field theory and the mathematical foundations of energy conservation principles.

progato
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to derive the conservaton of energy for electromagnetic fields with currents from the action principle, but I have some trouble understanding how the interaction term in the Lagrangian fits into this.

The approach I have seen so far has been to express the Lagrangian density as $$\mathcal{L}(x^\alpha, A_\alpha, \partial_\beta A_\alpha) = \mathcal{L}_{field} + \mathcal{L}_{int} = -\frac {1} {4\mu_0}F^{\alpha \beta}F_{\alpha \beta} - A_\alpha J^\alpha$$ and then derive the equations of motion from that in the usual way. This leads to Maxwell's equations.

The problem I have with this approach is that ##J^\alpha(x)## depends on the space-time coordinates. This means that the Lagrangian is not invariant with respect to time and I cannot derive energy conservation using time translational symmetry. Without the interaction term, this works fine.

The above Lagrangian only describes the motion of ##A_\alpha##. Is there a way to formulate a Lagrangian that describes how ##A_\alpha## and ##J^\alpha## evolves together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, there's exchange of energy, momentum, and angular momentum between the em. field and the charges. You can derive the expressions for the appropriate energy-momentum and angular-momentum densities (modulo total divergences which are fixed by the demand of gauge invariance, which leads from the canonical to the Belinfante energy-momentum tensor and the usual relation of it to the angular-momentum tensor) of the em. field. Then including the interactions with the charges leads to the additional terms in the energy-momentum-angular-momentum balance equations of the electromagnetic field, leading to the correct Lorentz-force form of the equation of motion.
 
Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, it is a little over my head. In particular, I had not heard of the Belinfante energy-momentum tensor until just now. I know how to derive the canonical energy-momentum tensor from the lagrangian density though. I am basically at the level where I can understand the "Theoretical Minimum" lectures or "The Variational Principles of Mechanics" as well as some differential geometry.

Do you mind elaborating a bit or provide pointers where I can find more information?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K