Deriving Entropy Formula: Thermo Solution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter olechka722
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Thermo
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a formula for entropy in thermodynamics, specifically addressing the integration of differential expressions involving temperature and volume. Participants explore the mathematical treatment of these expressions, considering the implications of partial derivatives and Maxwell relations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an initial expression for entropy, suggesting a desired form and expressing uncertainty about integrating due to the presence of two differentials.
  • Another participant argues that the terms can be integrated separately since they are functions of different variables, supporting this with a suggestion to verify by differentiation.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the derivatives are partial derivatives, indicating that the total change in entropy can be derived from integrating the two partial derivatives, while also noting the need for specific conditions regarding the heat capacity.
  • Further clarification is provided that while the terms represent partial derivatives, this alone does not justify the integration of the right-hand side as the sum of the integrals of the individual terms without additional conditions on the heat capacity function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the validity of integrating the terms separately, with some supporting the approach and others cautioning against it without additional considerations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proper method for integration.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of the heat capacity being treated as a constant and the implications of partial derivatives in the context of the integration process. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the idealization of the heat capacity function.

olechka722
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to derive a formula for entropy. I have:

dS= Cv/T dT + R/(V-b) dV

and want to get:

S= Cv*ln(T) + R*ln(V-b) + constant.

Math rules seem to say i can't just integrate this up even though it looks obvious since i have two different d's on the right hand side. Maybe something using Maxwell relations? Not sure.

Thank you for any help!

olechka
 
Science news on Phys.org
The first term on the right side contains only a constant, a function of T, and dT. The second term contains only constants, a function of V, and dV. It's OK to integrate the terms separately in this case. You can verify this by differentiating the second expression.
 
You can just integrate it up I believe. The derivatives in this instance are actually partial derivates if I am not mistaken (the evidence is that Cv is the heat capacity at constant V...which implies that the second term is the change due to volume at constant T). So the total change in S is the sum of the integration of the two partial derivatives.
 
Renge Ishyo said:
You can just integrate it up I believe. The derivatives in this instance are actually partial derivates if I am not mistaken (the evidence is that Cv is the heat capacity at constant V...which implies that the second term is the change due to volume at constant T). So the total change in S is the sum of the integration of the two partial derivatives.

Not quite. It's true that the terms represent partial derivatives; that is, we're looking at

dS=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V dT+\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T dV

However, this observation isn't sufficient to conclude that the integral of the right hand side equals the sum of the integrals of the individual terms. We must also require that C_V(T,V)=T\left(\frac{\partial S(T,V)}{\partial T}\right)_V, which is generally a function of both T and V, is idealized as a constant, as I stated above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K