Deriving radial velocity as observed from infinity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the radial velocity as observed from infinity, specifically referencing Wheeler and Taylor's 'Exploring Black Holes.' The key equation for energy in Schwarzschild geometry is presented, leading to the need for deriving dr/dt for a stone falling from rest at a great distance. Participants seek clarification on the derivation process between specific equations, particularly how to manipulate the terms involving dt² and dr². The conversation emphasizes the importance of rearranging terms correctly to achieve the desired expression for radial velocity. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in understanding the mathematical relationships in Schwarzschild geometry.
stevebd1
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
747
Reaction score
41
In Wheeler and Taylor's 'Exploring Black Holes', on pages 3-12 and 3-13, the bookkeeper measure of radial velocity (i.e. radial velocity as measured from infinity) is derived. Basically the equation for 'Energy in Schwarzschild geometry' is established-

\frac{E}{m}=\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\frac{dt}{d\tau}=1

The book states-

'From the energy equation and the Schwarzschild metric, we can find an expression for dr/dt, the rate of the change of the r-coordinate with far-away time t for a stone starting from rest at a very great distance. To obtain this derivative, square terms on either side of the right-hand equality, multiply through by d\tau^2, and equate it to the Schwarzschild metric equation for d\tau^2 in the case of radial fall (d\phi=0):

\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^2dt^2=d\tau^2=\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)dt^2-\frac{dr^2}{\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Divide through by dt^2, solve for dr/dt, and take the square root to obtain<br /> <br /> \frac{dr}{dt}=-\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\left(\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{1/2}I&#039;d appreciate if someone could show the process of derivation between the second and third equation.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
stevebd1 said:
\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^2dt^2=d\tau^2=\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)dt^2-\frac{dr^2}{\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Divide through by dt^2, solve for dr/dt, and take the square root to obtain<br /> <br /> \frac{dr}{dt}=-\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\left(\frac{2M}{r}\right)^{1/2}<br /> <br /> <br /> I&#039;d appreciate if someone could show the process of derivation between the second and third equation.
<br /> <br /> Hi stevebd1! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" /><br /> <br /> Ignore the dtau<sup>2</sup> in the middle, and the coefficient of dt<sup>2</sup> becomes (1 - 2M/r)(1 - 2M/r - 1) <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":wink:" title="Wink :wink:" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=":wink:" />
 
Hi tiny-tim

Thanks for the response. I'm probably missing something elementary here but could you shed some light on how you arrived at that coefficient for dt2?
 
stevebd1 said:
Hi tiny-tim

Thanks for the response. I'm probably missing something elementary here but could you shed some light on how you arrived at that coefficient for dt2?

Yup … in
stevebd1 said:
\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^2dt^2=\,\cdots\,=\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)dt^2-\frac{dr^2}{\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)}

rearrange to \left[\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)^2\ -\ \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\right]dt^2\ =\ -\frac{dr^2}{\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)}

which is \left[\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right\ -\ 1)\right]dt^2\ =\ -\frac{dr^2}{\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)} :smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top