Deriving the Claim: \sin^2\theta/r Conservation in Pulsar Gamma-Ray Emission

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of the quantity \sin^2\theta/r along dipolar magnetic field lines in pulsar gamma-ray emission. To derive this claim, it is suggested to take the gradient of c and demonstrate its perpendicularity to the magnetic field B, indicating that c remains constant along the field lines. Clarification is provided that if the gradient of a quantity is perpendicular to a field, it implies that the quantity does not change in the direction of that field. Participants inquire about the types of texts that cover these derivations, with vector analysis and electromagnetism being recommended. Understanding this concept is essential for studying the mechanisms behind gamma-ray emissions from pulsars.
rbwang1225
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
When I study the mechanism of gamma-ray emission from pulsars, I got a statement saying that the quantity \sin^2\theta/r is conserved along any dipolar magnetic field line.

Does anybody know how to derive this claim?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field of a magnetic dipole is B = (m/r3)(3r(r·z) - z) where r, z are unit vectors.

Let c = sin2Θ/r = (r2 - z2)/r3. Take the gradient of c and show that it is perpendicular to B. This shows that the lines c = const are the magnetic lines of force.
 
Bill_K said:
The field of a magnetic dipole is B = (m/r3)(3r(r·z) - z) where r, z are unit vectors.

Let c = sin2Θ/r = (r2 - z2)/r3. Take the gradient of c and show that it is perpendicular to B. This shows that the lines c = const are the magnetic lines of force.

Sorry, I do not understand why the gradient of c is perpendicular to B means that the lines c = const are the magnetic lines of force. And is c a constant?

Regards
 
rbwang1225 said:
Sorry, I do not understand why the gradient of c is perpendicular to B means that the lines c = const are the magnetic lines of force. And is c a constant?

Regards

If the gradient, i.e. the "change" of some quantity is perpendicular to some other field, it means that the quantity has no change in the direction of the field. It is therefore constant along the lines of that field.
 
Wow! I got it, but could you tell me what kind of text have this kind of derivations? calculus? or vector analysis?

Thanks!
 
rbwang1225 said:
Wow! I got it, but could you tell me what kind of text have this kind of derivations? calculus? or vector analysis?

Thanks!

It should be covered in any introduction to vector analysis. Texts on electromagnetism might also help.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top