Deriving the trajectory of the particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the trajectory of a charged particle in uniform electric and magnetic fields, influenced solely by the Lorentz force. Participants seek clarification on the relevant equations and principles, particularly Newton's laws, to approach the problem. The Lorentz force equation, F=q(E+v*B), is highlighted as crucial for understanding the particle's motion. There is a focus on the implications of the particle being released from rest and how this affects its trajectory over time. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for foundational knowledge in electromagnetism to solve the problem effectively.
Tuugii
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is a uniform electric field E, and a uniform magnetic field B in space. A particle of mass m, and charge q, at the origin is released from rest at t=0. The only acting force on the body is the Lorentz force. Derive the trajectory of the particle for t>=0.


Homework Equations


Lorentz force: F=q(E+v*B)


The Attempt at a Solution



Please give some hints. :)

thanks,
T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: sum of forces equals what?
 
thanks

forces? it says the only force is Lorentz one...

hey I am totally newbie to EM. :P
 
OK, let me rephrase the question: which of Newtons laws is relevant here?
 
3rd law, and the sum is 0
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Circular trajectory traveled by a charged particle in a magnetic field
Replies
3
Views
2K
Moving charge deflected by a loop of wire
Replies
1
Views
660
Finding a Parametric Solution for Particle Trajectory in Magnetic Field
Replies
3
Views
1K
Lorentz force and induced electric field
Replies
6
Views
1K
Two spring-coupled masses in an electric field (one of the masses is charged)
Replies
1
Views
852
Making sense of sequence of ideas in MIT OCW's 8.02 notes on Faraday
Replies
1
Views
1K
Spring-mediated dipole in a magnetic field
Replies
31
Views
2K
Electrodynamics: charge of a particle
Replies
25
Views
2K
Radial force on charged particle in beam of positive ions
Replies
12
Views
2K
Why Does Gravitational Potential Energy Seem Absent in Magnetic Field Motion?
Replies
26
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top