Designing a Tennis Ball Launcher: Overcoming Constraints and Maximizing Accuracy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a tennis ball launcher that can accurately toss a projectile within specified constraints. Participants explore various mechanical designs, including trebuchets, catapults, and spring mechanisms, while considering factors such as size, materials, and launch accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a trebuchet design, noting its potential accuracy but expressing concerns about fitting within the 2' by 2' footprint.
  • Another suggests using a spring mechanism for launching, highlighting the importance of a high spring constant and low friction for accurate predictions of launch velocity.
  • A third participant recommends leveraging a vertical shaft and lever system to control launch velocity and angle, suggesting that this could simplify calculations for distance traveled.
  • Some participants argue that a catapult design may offer better control over release speed and angle compared to a trebuchet, emphasizing the significance of the release mechanism over the energy source.
  • Concerns are raised about friction affecting predictions, although one participant downplays its impact as negligible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best design approach, with some favoring catapults and others considering trebuchets or spring mechanisms. There is no consensus on a single optimal solution, and various ideas are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for precise calculations regarding launch velocity and angle, but there are unresolved assumptions about the effects of friction and the specific definitions of the size constraints.

aqscithe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok, so here I go.

Problem

Objective: It is simply to create a device to accurately toss a projectile.

Constraints:
-Must fire a tennis ball anywhere between a 5' to 20' operating range.
-Must fitwithin a 2 by 2 footprint(basically when broken down into parts the device does not exceed 2' by 2').
-High pressure gases and combustible materials are not allowed(goodbye fun).
-Must be built mostly from scrap and recycled materials.

What this launcher has to do is get a tennis ball into a bucket (sitting up) at three points(chosen by my teacher) between 5' to 20'.

I am allowed three trials for each of the three points. Anything else done, parameters of course, is up to me.


Problem Attempt: Here are my ideas so far.

-I am thinking of going for a trebuchet type design. From what I've researched they are plenty accurate but I'm not sure I could break it down small enough parts to fit in a 2' by 2' footprint.


From there I've considered everything from a pitching machine to a simple catapult(basically I have made little progress). The calculations involved when it comes to getting the angle and velocity right, I have no problem with. All I'm hoping for are a few ideas from which to build momentum.

Thanks in advance guys and please inform me if anything needs to be clarified.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Beforehand I must add a disclaimer: I didn't do much engineering projects but most of them tended to fail miserably :smile:

Anyway, maybe you can use a spring to launch the ball. If you can find a rigid spring (high spring constant) you won't need much space, and if you have a metal barrel then you will have relatively low friction so it should be fairly easy to do theoretical calculations (i.e. how much do I have to compress the spring to get the required velocity).

The biggest problem in predicting the goal will be the friction, both with the launching mechanism and air friction while the ball is in-flight. Luckily you are shooting a tennis ball, which should provide relatively low friction. If your tests show that it is rather small, you can probably predict where the ball will land quite accurately.

By the way, what is 2 by 2? Inches, meters, yards, Boeing 747 wing spans?
 
CompuChip said:
Beforehand I must add a disclaimer: I didn't do much engineering projects but most of them tended to fail miserably :smile:

Anyway, maybe you can use a spring to launch the ball. If you can find a rigid spring (high spring constant) you won't need much space, and if you have a metal barrel then you will have relatively low friction so it should be fairly easy to do theoretical calculations (i.e. how much do I have to compress the spring to get the required velocity).

The biggest problem in predicting the goal will be the friction, both with the launching mechanism and air friction while the ball is in-flight. Luckily you are shooting a tennis ball, which should provide relatively low friction. If your tests show that it is rather small, you can probably predict where the ball will land quite accurately.

By the way, what is 2 by 2? Inches, meters, yards, Boeing 747 wing spans?
2' means two feet.
2'' means two inches.
 
If your only constraint is 2'x2', then take complete advantage of no vertical requirement. If you drop a ball inside a vertical shaft that's attached to some sort of lever, then you can precisely calculate the launch velocity. If have a "stop" on the lever so that the ball always leaves at a certain angle, then you could completely predict the distance traveled (assuming the tennis ball's weight is negligible to the dropped mass).

good luck
 
You want something you can completely control the release speed and angle of.

I would recommend a catapult (spring stored energy) design over a trebuchet (gravitational pe). Think about why you could control a spring more than dropping a mass. Also from experience the energy provider in these situations is far less critical than the release mechanism.

Dont worry about friction or air resistance as its negligable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K