Destroying A Black Hole: Can Alice Escape?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,750
So we know that Alice can free fall through the event horizon of a black hole and not notice anything. Yet Passing the event horizon is a one way event; no thing and no information can ever exit. (Except Hawking radiation).

As a thought experiment, suppose we bombard the black hole with antimatter thus annihilating the mass? Could that make the black hole white again? At the very least could it make the radius of the event horizon decrease putting Alice outside the horizon once again?

There could be a couple of flaws.

The radiation produced by annihilation might gravitate as much as the mass did. Then the radius of the event horizon would increase.

It could also be true that a particle falling into a black hole can never catch up with another particle that fell in earlier. In that case the antimatter would never meet the matter. No annihilation would occur and the radius of the event horizon would increase.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anorlunda said:
So we know that Alice can free fall through the event horizon of a black hole and not notice anything. Yet Passing the event horizon is a one way event; no thing and no information can ever exit. (Except Hawking radiation).

As a thought experiment, suppose we bombard the black hole with antimatter thus annihilating the mass? Could that make the black hole white again? At the very least could it make the radius of the event horizon decrease putting Alice outside the horizon once again?

There could be a couple of flaws.

The radiation produced by annihilation might gravitate as much as the mass did. Then the radius of the event horizon would increase.

It could also be true that a particle falling into a black hole can never catch up with another particle that fell in earlier. In that case the antimatter would never meet the matter. No annihilation would occur and the radius of the event horizon would increase.

Antimatter has positive mass energy, just like matter. You would just increase the size of the BH.

Note, it is possible for a later infaller to catch an earlier infaller, depending on their trajectories outside the horizon. For example, suppose earlier infaller was resisting infall a meter from the horizon until they ran out of fuel. Suppose a later, suicidal infaller was firing thrust at their maximum speeding up their approach, up through and past the horizon. If the suicidal infaller isn't too much behind the unwilling infaller, they will catch up.
 
The only thing that could destroy black hole is something with negative mass which has never been observed(all the things we know have positive mass). The BH sucks up everything. No matter what you put whenever something passes the event horizon there is no way back.
And the other thing is that you can't describe the black hole like compilation of particles.
The event horizon is just part of spacetime. And the real matter that came into the black hole is contained in the singularity. At that point ordinary particles can't exist. There is not even clear definition of what spacetime is at this scale.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Back
Top