Destructive Interference and the Conservation of Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the phenomenon of destructive interference in light waves and its implications for the conservation of energy. When two coherent laser beams are perfectly out of phase, they result in 100% destructive interference, theoretically canceling each other out. However, the energy is not lost; instead, it can be reflected or transferred to other forms, maintaining the law of conservation of energy. The conversation highlights the complexities of optical arrangements and the practical limitations in achieving perfect interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave optics, specifically interference patterns.
  • Familiarity with coherent light sources, such as lasers.
  • Knowledge of the principles of energy conservation in physics.
  • Basic concepts of light behavior when interacting with different media.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of wave interference and its mathematical descriptions.
  • Explore the behavior of light in optical systems, focusing on reflection and refraction.
  • Study the conservation of energy in wave phenomena, particularly in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate practical applications of destructive interference in optical technologies.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students studying wave optics or energy conservation principles will benefit from this discussion.

Rattus_norveg
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is a question concerning the wave nature of light and the conservation of energy.

Consider a prism that combines two sources of monochromatic, coherent (laser) light into one beam. The sources are adjusted so that the laser beams combine in phase resulting in constructive interference. So, the resultant beam has the same wavelength as the parent beams but it's electric and magnetic vectors have twice the amplitude.

Now consider the same setup but with the one parent beam adjusted so that the beams combine 180 degrees out of phase, resulting in 100 percent destructive interference. The electric field vector of the first beam exactly cancels the electric field vector of the second beam and vice versa; the same is true for the magnetic field vector.

It seems that at this point, with the two light beams perfectly combined 180 degrees out of phase that the resultant beam of light is effectively obliterated. If so, where does the energy go? How is the law of conservation of energy maintained when considering this system?
 

Attachments

  • light interference 01.png
    light interference 01.png
    15.6 KB · Views: 898
Science news on Phys.org
You asssume that the light has only one way out
In fact,the light beams can be reflected at the surface
Once the refracted light is canceled out,the reflected light will be strengthened.
 
Sorry if this seems nit picky but the optical arrangement shown will not bend both beams through 90 degrees and bring them together.
 
I do not believe that this image is an accurate representation. The two beams of light are internally reflecting off of different surfaces, so they are not spatially colocated. Therefore, they cannot exhibit complete destructive interference. I think this is also what Dadface noticed.
 
Don't take the drawing too literally, the whole question is meant as a thought experiment. Here I'm assuming that there is some optical arrangement that would blend the two beams. It is probably not possible to create optics to blend the beams perfectly in real life.
 
Hmm, why would two (different) beams give interference? I thought each quantum only interferes with itself. Is it a boson thing?
 
Rattus_norveg said:
Here I'm assuming that there is some optical arrangement that would blend the two beams. It is probably not possible to create optics to blend the beams perfectly in real life.
That is correct, you can get destructive interference in some places and constructive interference in others, but energy is conserved overall. You can also, of course, have interactions with matter where energy is transferred between the fields and matter, but again energy is conserved overall.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K