Controlling output light power by constructive/destructive interference

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the principles of controlling optical power through constructive and destructive interference, particularly in the context of a Mach-Zehnder modulator used in optical communications. Participants explore the implications of energy conservation when light is split and recombined, raising questions about the output power in cases of destructive interference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that a Mach-Zehnder modulator works by splitting light into two paths and inducing a phase difference to control output power through interference.
  • Another participant suggests that while destructive interference may lead to cancellation in one direction, energy may still be present in other directions.
  • Concerns are raised about the schematic representation, questioning the visibility of how light is split and recombined.
  • A participant proposes the use of half-silvered mirrors for splitting and combining light, referencing a beam splitter diagram to illustrate the concept.
  • One participant acknowledges the points made regarding multiple output directions, indicating a level of understanding of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of destructive interference and energy conservation, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the assumptions regarding energy conservation in the context of destructive interference and the specifics of the optical setup, leaving these points open for further exploration.

Mayan Fung
Messages
131
Reaction score
14
In optical communications, one of the modulation methods is to control the optical power (Simplest case, for example, bright = bit 1, dim = bit 0). I learned that we can achieve this by a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZ modulator).

Simply speaking, the principle of MZ modulator is to split the input light into two, traveling in two waveguides. By applying a voltage across one of the two arms, we can alter the refractive index of it and thus inducing a phase difference between the two split lights. Then, when they are combined as one output light signal, if they constructively interfere, then the output power is maximum (bit 1). Otherwise, if they destructively interfere, then the output power is minimum (bit 0).

It sounds good till here. Yet, I am puzzled about energy conservation. Let's say we split the input light into two with the same amplitude. When they combined with destructive interference, there is no light. How come we have optical power input but no power output?

1596513844585.png
 
Science news on Phys.org
The two point sources are combined so as to get cancellation in one direction.
There will be other directions in which the energy is summed.
 
Baluncore said:
The two point sources are combined so as to get cancellation in one direction.
There will be other directions in which the energy is summed.

But in the above schematic, seems that there is only one output direction. Can the light escape the wavelength?
 
Chan Pok Fung said:
But in the above schematic, seems that there is only one output direction.
The diagram is symbolic.
It is not shown how light is split into two channels.
It is not shown how light is recombined into one line.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Baluncore said:
The diagram is symbolic.
It is not shown how light is split into two channels.
It is not shown how light is recombined into one line.
One possibility is to split and combine with half silvered mirrors. The diagram of a beam splitter is on this Wiki page. There are two input ports and two output ports. When combining your two beams, one port will let through the sum and the other will let through the difference resultants. You 'just' need to get the path lengths right to achieve that.
 
I see your points. That makes sense if there are two outputs. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K