Detention For 16 Year Old Who Assaulted 8 Women In Less Than Two Hours

  • Thread starter Thread starter GCT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Women Year
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the sentencing of a young offender in the U.S. for a violent act, with participants speculating about the implications of his "good background" on his punishment. There is concern that a supportive family background may lead to more lenient sentences compared to those from lower-income families, raising questions about social class discrimination in the justice system. Some argue that a crime committed by someone from a good family is more troubling, as it suggests a failure to adhere to societal norms despite having positive role models. The offender received a four-year sentence in juvenile hall, which participants generally view as reasonable for his age. There are also discussions about the offender's mental state and the nature of his actions, with suggestions that he may lack full control over his behavior. The conversation touches on the complexities of rehabilitation and the potential for monitoring the offender post-release.
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard to say. I assume somewhere on the order of five years in prison. What I find surprising is that this attacker's "good background" worked in his favor. Does this mean that if he came from a lower income family he would have been sentenced more harshly? Hopefully, here in America civil rights activists would be all over this for discrimination on the basis of social class.
 
I don't think 'good supportive background' is indicative of any social class. I think it means that he has family support (who aren't all similarly criminal minded) that will hopefully set him on the right track once he gets out. You can have a supportive family if you come from a low income family.
 
Kurdt said:
I don't think 'good supportive background' is indicative of any social class. I think it means that he has family support (who aren't all similarly criminal minded) that will hopefully set him on the right track once he gets out. You can have a supportive family if you come from a low income family.

Exactly: there is no discrimination expressed here by the judge.
 
I kind of look at it the other way around. The crime seems much worse if the kid comes from a good family...he had all the right upbringing and role models in place, yet acted out violently anyway. Doesn't that seem worse than a kid raised in a family of criminals who was simply never taught good behavior?
 
He got 4 years in juvenile hall. That's about the same as what someone that age would get here. isn't it?
 
OK, maybe I was misunderstanding the "good background" thing. But Moonbear's point is a good one. I'm not sure I personally agree with using an explanation of someone's bad behavior to absolve him/her. But I could see a judge partially excusing a person who comes from a "bad" background. This doesn't make much sense.
 
arunma said:
OK, maybe I was misunderstanding the "good background" thing. But Moonbear's point is a good one. I'm not sure I personally agree with using an explanation of someone's bad behavior to absolve him/her. But I could see a judge partially excusing a person who comes from a "bad" background. This doesn't make much sense.

You can see a judge partially excusing someone who is more likely to offend again yet can't see them being a bit more lenient if their actions are an aberration and they have the support necessary to be rehabilitated? :confused:
 
  • #10
he was dry humping his victims? why do get the impression he's not playing with a full deck?
 
  • #11
Proton Soup said:
he was dry humping his victims? why do get the impression he's not playing with a full deck?

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Frotterism

There was an " Intent to rape " , even when he did not actually rape anyone despite the fact that he could have , however it was still a bit more than Frotterism.

The judge possibly sensed that boy was a bit disadvantaged mentally - eight women are going to deal with being fondled - and none of them are going to be recompensed. Apparently it is going to be easy to monitor him.
 
  • #12
GCT said:
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Frotterism

There was an " Intent to rape " , even when he did not actually rape anyone despite the fact that he could have , however it was still a bit more than Frotterism.

The judge possibly sensed that boy was a bit disadvantaged mentally - eight women are going to deal with being fondled - and none of them are going to be recompensed. Apparently it is going to be easy to monitor him.

sure, people have fetishes, but i think you are agreeing with me that perhaps he isn't fully in control of himself. he also claims not to remember some of the attacks. hard to say how much is malice, but he sounds a bit like a rowdy dog. maybe a few good swats with a newspaper and some chemical assistance would help.
 
  • #13
Four years seems like a decent sentence for a 16 year old. What's the point of this thread?
 
  • #14
I think he thought the kid got detention as in you have to stay after school for an hour in detention.
 

Similar threads

10-year-old boys have been charged with raping an 8 years old girl
Replies
46
Views
10K
Women in UK get 2 year old kids to fight each other
Replies
5
Views
3K
Why Do Women Fall for Guys Who Lie?
Replies
21
Views
12K
Women's Secrets: Spilled in 47 Hours & 15 Minutes
2
Replies
55
Views
10K
News Rape Allegations Against Donald Trump
Replies
15
Views
4K
Is This Cat Really Bigger Than a Six-Year-Old Boy?
Replies
11
Views
7K
Is Scotland's Ban on Guns the Solution to Ending Violence?
Replies
13
Views
7K
From an evolutionary perspective, why do women have bosoms?
3
Replies
119
Views
23K
Was a Gun T-Shirt Really a Security Risk?
Replies
8
Views
3K
Are men wired differently than women?
2
Replies
78
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top