Determinant g = g_{00} det |g_{ij}|

  • Thread starter Thread starter wandering.the.cosmos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
wandering.the.cosmos
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
If we let latin alphabets {i,j,k,...} denote the spatial indices, and the greek ones run from 0 to 3, then I've seen the following

det| g_{\mu \nu} | = g_{00} det | g_{ij} |

both in Landau's "Classical theory of fields", as well as ADM's paper on the initial value formulation of GR ("Dynamics of General Relativity", Arnowitt et al.) I don't quite understand it though, or am I reading it right?

Specifically, what about the terms that involve g_{01}, g_{02}, g_{03} when we do the co-factor expansion? Do they somehow vanish by symmetry?

In (2+1) dimensions I got the determinant to be

det| g_{\mu \nu} | = g_{00} det | g_{ij} | - g_{10}(g_{01} g_{22} - g_{02} g_{21}) + g_{20} (g_{01} g_{12} - g_{11} g_{02})

How could the last four terms cancel out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
g_{\mu\nu} can be any symmetric matrix.

If we try for an example

<br /> \left[ \begin {array}{cccc} m&amp;1&amp;2&amp;3\\\noalign{\medskip}1&amp;4&amp;5&amp;6\\\noalign{\medskip}2&amp;5&amp;7&amp;8\\\noalign{\medskip}3&amp;6&amp;8&amp;9\end {array}<br /> \right] <br />

we find the determinant is -m-2, which is not a multiple of m.

So I don't think your statement can be correct as written. Start reading the fine print :-).

(Is the ADM paper online anywhere?)
 
It is equation 3.12 of "The Dynamics of General Relativity", Arnowitt, Deser and Misner:

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0405109

Perhaps someone could explain to me if I am mis-reading it.
 
That is correct assuming that the metric tensor is of the form
\left[ \begin {array}{cccc} g_{00}&amp;0&amp;0&amp;0\\\noalign{\medskip}0&amp;g_{11}&amp;g_{12}&amp;g_{13}\\\noalign{\medskip}0&amp;g_{21}&amp;g_{22}&amp;g{23}\\\noalign{\medskip}0&amp;g_{31}&amp;g_{32}&amp;g_{33}\end {array} \right], the "three plus one dimensional decomposition of the Einstein field" referred to in the text.
 
wandering.the.cosmos said:
If we let latin alphabets {i,j,k,...} denote the spatial indices, and the greek ones run from 0 to 3, then I've seen the following

det| g_{\mu \nu} | = g_{00} det | g_{ij} |

both in Landau's "Classical theory of fields",

When a metric is static, coordinates can be chosen such that the components of the metric take the form given by HallsofIvy.

as well as ADM's paper on the initial value formulation of GR ("Dynamics of General Relativity", Arnowitt et al.)

I don't think equations (3.10) and (3.12) of the ADM paper give this.
 
I have indeed mis-read the ADM paper. What it says is

g^{00} = \frac{\textrm{det} |g_{ij}|}{\textrm{det} |g_{\mu \nu}|}

where \textrm{det} |g_{ij}| is the determinant of the space-space part of the metric and \textrm{det} |g_{\mu \nu}| is the determinant of the whole metric tensor.

This follows from Cramer's rule.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
35
Views
28K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top