Determination of signs in basic capacitance problems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the signs of charges in capacitance problems, specifically in the context of a coaxial cable with inner radius ri and outer radius r0 filled with a dielectric of constant epsilon. The participant successfully calculates the capacitance per unit length but encounters discrepancies in the sign of the result based on the assumed charge distribution. The key conclusion is that while the absolute value of capacitance is consistent, the sign is contingent upon the charge assignments of the conductors, which can be either Q and -Q or -Q and Q. The sign convention is crucial for ensuring the potential difference V is calculated correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics principles
  • Familiarity with capacitance calculations in coaxial cables
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their properties
  • Ability to perform integration in electrostatic contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance formulas for coaxial cables
  • Learn about charge distribution and its impact on electric fields
  • Explore the role of dielectric constants in capacitance calculations
  • Investigate potential difference calculations in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetics, capacitance, and electrostatic problems in coaxial systems.

Mr_J
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In my electromagnetics textbook ("Fundamentals of Engineering Electromagnetics" by DK Cheng) there is a typical problem with capacitance, conductors and cylindrical or spherical symmetry which pops up with different variations several times in the problems section of the electrostatics chapter. It goes something like this:

"The radius of the core and the inner radius of the outer conductor of a very long coaxial cable are ri and r0, respectively. The space between the conductors is filled with a layer of dielectric with dielectric constant epsilon. Deterimine the capacitance per unit length."

Now, I am able to solve this problem and get an answer which is identical with the one given in the book, but with one exception: my answer frequently has the "wrong" sign.

My question, then, is: is there a "right" or "wrong" sign for the capacitance in the above problem? In my calculations, the sign in the answer changes if I switch the signs for the charges in the two conductors in the cable (in the solution of the problem you can either set the core to charge Q and the outer conductor to -Q -- where Q is positive -- or, you could set the core to -Q and the outer conductor to Q). Is there a way for me to determine what the signs of the charges of the conductors really are? Does it really matter?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you calculate the potential difference V, you want to integrate along a path that goes from the negatively charged conductor to the positively charged conductor so that V comes out positive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K