Determine a unit vector perpendicular to the given planes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining a unit vector perpendicular to given planes using the cross product method. Participants confirm that the unit vector can be expressed as ##C = c_2 (-\dfrac {3}{2}i + j - 3k)##, where ##c_2## must be solved to ensure the vector is a unit vector. The conversation highlights that both ##c_1## and ##c_3## can also be utilized in the solution, and emphasizes the importance of simplifying the expression to achieve the correct unit vector. The cross product of vectors ##A## and ##B## is also mentioned as a valid approach to solve the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, specifically cross products.
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and normalization techniques.
  • Familiarity with vector notation and components (i, j, k).
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations involving constants like ##c_1, c_2, c_3##.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute the cross product of two vectors in three-dimensional space.
  • Study the process of normalizing vectors to find unit vectors.
  • Explore the implications of using different constants (##c_1, c_2, c_3##) in vector equations.
  • Review vector analysis concepts in Schaum's textbook on Vector Analysis for deeper insights.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector analysis and need to understand the calculation of unit vectors and their applications in three-dimensional space.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
see attached.
Relevant Equations
vectors
1644904407756.png


1644904443732.png


I looked at this question and i wanted to ask if we could also use; ##C## =## c_2 ##(##-\dfrac {3}{2}i## +## j - 3k)## ... cheers

This problem can also be solved by using the approach of cross product ##A×B##...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
Homework Statement:: see attached.
Relevant Equations:: vectors

View attachment 297125

View attachment 297126

I looked at this question and i wanted to ask if we could also use; ##C## =## c_2 ##(##-\dfrac {3}{2}i## +## j - 3k)## ... cheers

This problem can also be solved by using the approach of cross product ##A×B##...
They're asking for a unit vector, so you will need to solve for ##c_2##. Doing so will give you exactly the same two vectors as shown in the solution.
 
I understand that...I just wanted to be certain that we could work with any ##c_1, c_2## or ##c_3##...thanks...working to the given solution is straightforward.
 
Mark44 said:
They're asking for a unit vector, so you will need to solve for ##c_2##. Doing so will give you exactly the same two vectors as shown in the solution.
By the way Mark what do you mean by solve for ##c_2?##...in the text they worked with ##c_3## to solution...I am assuming that you mean the same will apply for ##c_2##.
Mark44 said:
They're asking for a unit vector, so you will need to solve for ##c_2##. Doing so will give you exactly the same two vectors as shown in the solution.
 
chwala said:
By the way Mark what do you mean by solve for ##c_2##?
Because you wrote "##C = c_2 (-\dfrac {3}{2}i + j - 3k)## and it needs to be a unit vector. There are only two values of ##c_2## that make this a unit vector: one positive and one negative.
 
What i meant;
The unit vector in the direction of c can also be given by;
##±\dfrac{{-\frac {3}{2}}i+j-3k}{\sqrt \frac{49}{4}}...##

using either ##c_1, c_2## or ##c_3## would work as indicated in my post ##3##.
 
Last edited:
chwala said:
What i meant;
The unit vector in the direction of c can also be given by;
##±\dfrac{{-\frac {3}{2}}i+j-3k}{\sqrt \frac{49}{4}}##
Yes, but why would you want to write it this way without simplifying it? Dividing by ##\frac{49} 4## is equivalent to multiplying by 2/7. If you do this, you get the same result as shown in the solution.
 
Mark44 said:
Yes, but why would you want to write it this way without simplifying it? Dividing by ##\frac{49} 4## is equivalent to multiplying by 2/7. If you do this, you get the same result as shown in the solution.
Yes of course I can simplify that! ...I was just indicating to you on what I meant...we shall end up with same solution...
Cheers Mark. Thanks.
 
Why don't you check the solution by taking the cross-product of \vec{A} and \vec{B} and normalizing it
 
  • #10
I did check and confirmed that the problem can also be solved by using cross- product...where ##A×B=15i-10j+30k## ...

My only query was specific on ##c_1,c_2## and ##c_3##...Cheers
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #11
As a side-comment, it seems you're using a book where exercise solutions use round numbers. Notice the scaling was by a nice nimber like 2/7 and not, a.g., ##\sqrt 13 /2 ##.
 
  • #12
WWGD said:
As a side-comment, it seems you're using a book where exercise solutions use round numbers. Notice the scaling was by a nice nimber like 2/7 and not, a.g., ##\sqrt 13 /2 ##.
That's true...am actually using Schaum's textbook on Vector Analysis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K