Determine if the space is a subspace testing both closure axioms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a specific set of vectors in R², defined by the condition ab=0, forms a subspace by testing the closure axioms of addition and scalar multiplication.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the closure axioms by testing specific vector combinations and questioning whether the resulting vectors remain within the defined set.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the closure properties under addition and scalar multiplication, with some participants providing examples and counterexamples to illustrate their points. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations regarding the conditions for subspace status.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions and conditions necessary for the vectors to belong to the subspace, particularly concerning the product of the components. There is also a mention of potential misinterpretation of the problem statement.

jackxxny
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


determine if the space is a subspace testing both closure axioms.

in R^2 the set of vectors (a,b) where ab=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i just used the sum and product which are the closure axioms.

But at the end how do you tell if the resulting vector is a subspace?

(a,b) + (c,d) = (a+c, b+d)

(a+c)(b+d)=0 then ab+cb + ad+dc=0 ab+cb = -ad-dc

then ?

x=constant

x(a,b) = (xa,xb) then abx^2 =0


then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


How about you look at (1, 1) and (1, -1) ?
 


If (a,b) and (c,d) are in the set. For it to be a subspace (a+c,b+d) needs to be in the set. To be in the set (a+c).(b+d)=0 needs to be satisfied. Proof that the equality holds. Then do the same for scalar multiplication. If both equalities hold you can conclude it is a subspace.
 
Last edited:


so if i set
a=1 , b=1 , c=1 , d=-1


and add (a,b) +(c,d)
i will have 1+1-1-1 = 0

Is that the way to prove it?


is isn't the roduct beetween a and b has to be equal to 0. I understand by that that one of the 2 terms has to be 0 right?
 


then if i set (0,12) and (45,0) both are in the set but when i add them

(45,12) they are not in the space anymore right?

45*12 is not equal to 0 right?
 


What you say in post 4 is not correct. The sum of both may be zero but separately they aren't even in the subspace, since (1,1), 1*1=1!=0.

What you say in post 5 is correct, because 0*12=45*0=0.

That said is this really the problem? As you've stated the problem it could be read that a and b are vectors in R^2 and they are a subspace when a.b=0 (inner product). I think CompuChip interpreted your question like this.
 
Last edited:


Yes, that is an example of how it works. I'm not sure why one would use (1,1), (1,-1). They aren't in the subspace.

As Cyosis began, you can use two arbitrary vectors, X=(a,b) and Y=(c,d) where ab=0 and cd=0. However, investigating closure under addition, X+Y = (a+c,b+d). Let's let e=a+c, f=b+d meaning X + Y = (e,f). For closure to be true, ef=0. Plug back in what e and f are and you get (a+c)(b+d). Does this equal 0? That is, is it in the subspace for arbitrary a,b,c,d?
 


so under addition does not work... by it does work under product...

in the end is not a subspace...

it's so good learning the material like that...thanks to all of you...
 


Ah, I must apologize.
I misread the condition of "ab equal to 0" as "ab not equal to 0".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K