Determine the length of the curve sin(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Length
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the length of the sine curve from x=0 to 2π, which involves the integral ∫ from 0 to 2π of √(1 + cos²(x)) dx. This integral is identified as a form of an elliptical integral, which cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. The numerical value can be approximated using methods like Simpson's rule or numerical integration techniques. The conversation highlights that this problem is similar in complexity to finding the area under a curve, emphasizing the need for approximations in both cases. Ultimately, the length of the sine curve is expressed as 4√2E(1/2), where E(x) represents the complete elliptical integral of the second kind.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
What is the measure of the sin(x) wave for x=0 to 2∏?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's \int^{2\pi}_0\sqrt{\cos(x)^2+1} dx
 
That's what I got. Would one need a table of integrals to determine its numerical value?
 
Pretty straight forward, isn't it? Considering the other problems you have posted on here, you should be able to do this.

The length of the graph of y= f(x), from x= a to x= b, is given by
\int_{x=a}^b \sqrt{1+ f'(x)^2}dx
With y= f(x)= sin(x), f'(x)= cos(x) so that becomes
\int_{x=0}^{2\pi} \sqrt{1+ cos^2(x)}dx
However, that looks to me like a version of an elliptical integral which cannot be done in terms of elementary functions.

Hey, no fair posting while I'm typing!
 
HallsofIvy said:
However, that looks to me like a version of an elliptical integral which cannot be done in terms of elementary functions.
Yep. It's 4√2E(1/2), where E(x) is the complete elliptical integral of the second kind.
 
to get a numerical value try numerical integration, simpson's rule? etc...

this is no worse than finding the area under the curve from 0 to 1. i.e. both are approximations.(nobody knows what cos(1) is.)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top