Determine the number of particles transmitted by S-G analyzer

AI Thread Summary
A beam of identical neutral particles with spin 1/2 is analyzed through two Stern-Gerlach (S-G) magnets, with the first allowing only spin-up particles and the second allowing only spin-down particles. The goal is to determine the minimum distance d between the analyzers such that only 25% of the particles transmitted by the first analyzer pass through the second. The probability of spin-flip is described using Rabi's formula, with the condition set to P+→- = 1/4. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the time evolution operator for the particles as they pass through a uniform magnetic field, and clarifies that the travel direction does not affect the Hamiltonian. The final equation for the probability of transmission through the second analyzer is confirmed as P_-(t) = sin²(ωt/2) = 1/4, leading to a straightforward calculation for the required time t.
acdurbin953
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beam of identical neutral particles with spin 1/2 travels along the y-axis. The beam passes through a series of two Stern-Gerlach spin analyzing magnets, each of which is designed to analyze the spin projection along the z-axis. The first Stern-Gerlach analyzer only allows particles with spin up (along the z-axis) to pass through. The second SternGerlach analyzer only allows particles with spin down (along the z-axis) to pass through. The particles travel at speed v0 between the two analyzers, which are separated by a region of length d in which there is a uniform magnetic field B pointing in the x-direction. Determine the smallest value of d such that only 25% of the particles transmitted by the first analyzer are transmitted by the second analyzer.

Homework Equations


Rabi's formula: In this instance I said w0 = 0, so the probability is given by P+→- = sin2(w1t/2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that I want 25% of the particles to come out of the second analyzer. Since both analyzers measure along the z-axis, and go from spin-up to spin-down, I have been trying to solve this using Rabi's formula for spin-flip. I set P+→- = sin2(w1t/2) = 1/4.

However, I am now feeling stuck and I think I have missed some things along the way:
1st: I forgot that the particles are said to be traveling along the y-axis, and I don't know if this matters in the problem. I currently have the input state before the particles enter the B-field as |ψ(0)> = |+>.

2nd: I need to solve for the distance, so I need to find the value of t from solving P+→- = 1/4. But I don't know what to use for my value of w1. For an electron I see that w = eB/me, but I don't know what to use for these neutral particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will be useful to write the states involved in the problem such that spin states along a certain direction are distinguished from the other directions. For example, I propose to use ##|z;\pm\rangle## to denote the states along ##z## direction.
So, in the beginning (after the first SG) the state is ##|z;+\rangle##. Then it propagates through a region of uniform magnetic field oriented along ##x## direction. Which means, this intermediate region is associated with the time evolution operator ##U = \exp\left(-i\omega\frac{S_x}{\hbar}t\right)##. Now apply this operator to the initial state, namely ##U|z;+\rangle##. Hint: to do this calculation, make use of the completeness relation for ##|x;\pm\rangle##.
acdurbin953 said:
1st: I forgot that the particles are said to be traveling along the y-axis, and I don't know if this matters in the problem. I currently have the input state before the particles enter the B-field as |ψ(0)> = |+>.
It does not matter because the direction of the travel does not affect the Hamiltonian.
acdurbin953 said:
but I don't know what to use for these neutral particles.
Since, the particle is unknown, I think you can leave the answer in term of ##\omega##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes acdurbin953
Thank for the insight that the direction does not affect the Hamiltonian - I hadn't realized that.

Starting from the beginning, I let my prepared state be |ψ(0)> = |+>.
This enters the B-field and since the probability is dependent on time, I need to apply U = eiωt/2 to my time evolved state |ψ(t)>.
If I catch you drift, I should write |ψ(0)> in the x basis at this point? So |ψ(0)> = 1/√2 (|+> + |->).
Then the time evolved state passing through the B-field before it enters the second analyzer is |ψ(t)> = 1/√2 * (e-iωt/2 |+> + eiωt/2 |->)
The probability I am looking for with this state coming from the second analyzer is then |<-|ψ(t)>|2.
Next I applied Euler's, and the probability becomes P- = 1/2 |cos(ωt/2) + isin(ωt/2)|2 = 1/4

Is that looking correct? I am not sure what to do about all of the cos and sin terms I end up with when I square what is inside the abs value. It doesn't seem there is a clean way to extract t. Should I not use Euler's?
 
Alright, actually after some check ups, the equation you already have from the final probability ##P_-(t) = \sin^2(\omega t/2)## is correct. If you want to follow step-by-step calculation, you will end up with that formula. So it's up to you whether you want to directly use the given formula or to firstly derive it. Either way, the equation you have is
$$
P_-(t) = \sin^2(\omega t/2) = \frac{1}{4}
$$
and you are asked to find the minimum value of ##t## such that ##t>0##. It should be easy.
 
Right - yeah if the original equation I had used is correct I'll stick with that. Thanks for your help!
 
is the answer w.r.t. v0??
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top