Determine the wave function of the particle

rmfw
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
[STRIKE][/STRIKE]

Homework Statement



A particle coming from +∞ with energy E colides with a potential of the form:

V = ∞ , x<0 (III)
V = -V0 , 0<x<a (II)
V = 0, x>a (I)

a) Determine the wave function of the particle considering that the amplitude of the incident wave is A. Writting the amplitude of the reflected wave at x=a in the form

\frac{B}{A} = e^{i\delta}

determine \delta . What is the value of \delta in the limit where V0 = 0 ?

b) Determine the probability density current in x>a

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

For region I :

\Psi_{I} (x) = Ae^{-ikx} + Be^{ikx} , k=\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}

II:

\Psi_{II} (x) = Csin(lx) + Dcos(lx) , l=\frac{\sqrt{2(mE+V_{0}}}{\hbar}

III:

\Psi_{III} (x) = 0Boundary conditions:

at x=0:

0 = Csin(lx) + Dcos(lx) (=) D = 0

So \Psi_{II} (x) = Csin(lx)

at x=a:

Ae^{-ika} + Be^{ika} = Csin(la) (1)

and

-ikAe^{-ika} + ikBe^{ika} = lCcos(la) (2)

Dividing (1) for (2) I got:

\frac{B}{A} = e^{-2ika} \frac{(-\frac{1}{l}tan(la)ik-1)}{(1-\frac{1}{l}tan(la)ik)}

How can I get rid of that constant that is multiplying by the exponential? Is this even right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
B/A appears to be a complex number - is that right?

Note: did you try writing ##\psi_{II}## as a sum of complex exponentials?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
B/A appears to be a complex number - is that right?

Note: did you try writing ##\psi_{II}## as a sum of complex exponentials?


Hi Simon Bridge, thank you for your reply.

I did write psiII as a sum of complex exponentials and I got the following:

\frac{B}{A} = \frac{\frac{k}{l}e^(ika-ila)-\frac{k}{l}e^(-ika + ila) - e^(-ika -ila) - e^(-ika + ila)}{\frac{k}{l}e^(ika-ila) - \frac{k}{l}e^(ika+ila) +e^(ika+ila) + e^(ika-ila)}

is there any way to simplify this ? This problem is killing me, because I'm not even sure what "writing the amplitude of the reflected wave at x=a in the form \frac{B}{A} " means.

I mean, I assumed the amplitude of the reflected wave at x=a is B, if I write B/A it isn't the amplitude of the reflected wave anymore.
 
B/A is the proportion of the incident amplitude that is reflected.
If you multiplied it by 100, you's be able to say, "100B/A percent got reflected".

You basically have to look for common factors and cancel things off a bit at a time.
It is not going to be easy. But that, I am afraid, is the exercise.

Note: ##e^{a-b}+e^{-a-b}=(e^a+e^{-a})e^{-b}## ... stuff like that. maybe ##e^{-b}## cancels something in the denominator? If not - look for something else.

Of course, since they are all constant terms, it may be possible to add them up geometrically.
Separate the real and imaginary components.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top