Determine whether this is a subspace

  • Thread starter Thread starter danago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether specific subsets of Rn, defined by matrix equations involving n x n matrices A and B, qualify as subspaces of Rn. The subsets in question include those defined by equations of the form Ax = 2x and Ax = Bx, among others.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions for a set to be a subspace, including the presence of the zero vector and closure under addition and scalar multiplication. They discuss specific subsets and their properties, questioning whether the zero vector satisfies the equations defining the sets.

Discussion Status

Some participants confirm the reasoning presented regarding the closure properties of the subsets. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the zero vector's presence in the sets and its impact on the classification as subspaces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the zero vector does not satisfy certain equations, which affects the classification of those subsets as subspaces. The discussion also reflects on the general method of proving a subset is a subspace through linear combinations.

danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
Let A,B be n x n matrices and e1 be the first standard basis vector in Rn. For each of the following subsets of Rn, determine whether it is a subspace of Rn, giving reasons.

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> \left\{ {x \in R^n |Ax = 2x} \right\} \\ <br /> \left\{ {x \in R^n |Ax = 2x + e_1 } \right\} \\ <br /> \left\{ {x \in R^n |Ax = Bx} \right\} \\ <br /> \left\{ {x \in R^n |Ax = Bx + e_1 } \right\} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]



Now i think I am ok with the second and last ones, but not so sure about the other two.

For the second and last ones, I've noticed that the zero vector does not satisfy the equation, thus the zero vector is not within the set and hence the set is not a subspace.

For the first and third, the zero vector is an element of the sets, which is one of the conditions of a subspace. The other condition would be that the set is closed under both addition and multiplication.

What i considered was to let [tex]a,b \in \left\{ {x \in R^n |Ax = 2x} \right\}[/tex], and then show that any linear combination of a and b is also within the set.

[tex] A(ka + lb) = k(Aa) + l(Ab) = k(2a) + l(2b) = 2(ka + lb)[/tex]

Where k and l are arbitary real constants.

And according to my understanding, this shows that any linear combination of a and b are within the set, hence the set is a subspace?

Is my reasoning correct? Id then apply the same reasoning to the third set.

Thanks,
Dan.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


your reasoning seems correct.
 


Yes, in general one shows that a subset of a vector space is a subspace by showing that the set is closed under addition and scalar multiplication- which is the same as saying that any linear combination, ka+ lb, where k and l are scalars and a and b are vectors in the subset, is also in that subset.

Because A is a matrix (more generally, a linear transformation), A(ka+ lb)= k(Aa)+ l(Ab). Since a and b are in the subset, Aa= 2a, Ab= 2b so A(ka+ lb)= k(2a)+ l(2b)= 2(ka+ lb), showing that ka+ lb also satisfies that equation and so is in that subset.
 


Alright thanks for the confirmation :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K