Determing if an equation is a function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ry122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the equation ((x-4)^(1/2))+3=y qualifies as a function. Participants are exploring the definitions and conditions that define a function, as well as the implications for its domain and range.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are debating the definition of a function and whether the given equation meets that definition. Some assert that the equation is not a function due to the potential for multiple y-values for a single x-value, while others argue that it can be considered a function under certain conditions. Questions about the domain and range are also raised, particularly concerning the implications of square roots of negative numbers.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the domain, suggesting it includes values greater than or equal to 4, while others question the validity of these interpretations. There is no explicit consensus on whether the equation is a function, but guidance on notation and domain considerations has been offered.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding the level of mathematical rigor expected in the homework context, and some participants express uncertainty about the implications of taking square roots of negative numbers. The discussion also touches on the importance of proper notation in expressing mathematical concepts.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
How do i determine if ((x-4)^(1/2))+3=y is a function? How do I determine the domain and range?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well by the definition of a function...that would not be considered a function as you can find one value of x that corresponds to two values of y.

to make that equation a function, you must specify whether the +ve or -ve of the square root must be taken
 
for every number you plug into X, there will be a number Y that would result.

so yes, it is a function.

domain is all positive numbers since you can't take the square root of a negative number.

well you can but I am assuming your teacher doesn't grade at that kind of level.

and again I am making assumptions because of the nature of your question.
 
Last edited:
sprint said:
for every number you plug into X, there will be a number Y that would result.

so yes, it is a function.

domain is all positive numbers since you can't take the square root of a negative number.

well you can but I am assuming your teacher doesn't grade at that kind of level.

and again I am making assumptions because of the nature of your question.

What about x=1? 1 is a positive number, and it still results in taking the square root of a negative number.
 
Since ((x-4)^(1/2))+3 is the same as sqroot(x-4)+3 doesn't this mean that
x-4=-3^2
(x-4)=9
and therefore it is a function?
In my book however it says that it is not a function and the domain is x > 4 andrange is
y is an element of IR
 
That doesn't make sense, the book says it is not a function, but still talks about the domain and range?

You have a prescription where you can plug in a number x, and get a unique number y (or none at all, but not multiple), so it is a function. To find the domain, you correctly remarked that you cannot take the square root of a negative number. So you should check for which x you will not get a negative number under the square root sign. But note, that to talk about the domain, you first have to establish that it is a function, it's no use doing a calculation and then saying: look I found a domain, therefore it is a function.
 
danago said:
What about x=1? 1 is a positive number, and it still results in taking the square root of a negative number.

yeah you are right. i meant {X: (X > 4) U (X =4)}
 
Careful with the notation!
You mean,
{X : (X > 4)} U {4}
or if you insist on writing it stupidly,
{X : (X > 4)} U {X: X = 4}
or, as it would be commonly written,
[tex]\{X : X \ge 4 \}[/tex]
 
whoa... don't need to throw insults around einstein

i would have written ex greater than or equal to four but i don't know how to use all that fancy latex stuff

besides, there was no error in writing it the way i wrote the domain. it is too anal to declare the variable twice... or to even have this conversation.
 
  • #10
Whoa, didn't know you were going to take that as an insult. I just wanted to point it out to you, because when people (in general) start writing domains and ranges, they often make mistakes in the notation and IMO it's important that one learns to write it correctly. So my remark was merely meant as constructive criticism. My apologies if you misunderstood my intentions.

By the way, if you can't use LaTeX, you can always use >= and anyone will understand what you mean (at least, I suppose anyone on this forum will) .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K