Determining direction of wave propagation from the phase?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The direction of wave propagation is determined by the wave vector \(\vec{k}\). A wave described by the phase \(\phi_1 = \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r} - \omega t\) propagates in the direction of \(\hat{k}\), while the phase \(\phi_2 = \vec{k} \cdot \vec{r} + \omega t\) indicates propagation in the direction of \(-\hat{k}\). The phase velocity can be calculated by differentiating the phase with respect to time, yielding the relationship \(dx/dt = \omega/k\). Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing wave behavior in electromagnetic contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave vectors and their notation
  • Familiarity with phase and frequency in wave mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of differentiation in calculus
  • Concept of phase velocity in wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of phase velocity in wave mechanics
  • Explore the implications of wave vector direction in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the relationship between wave frequency and wavelength
  • Investigate the effects of different time conventions on wave equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics and electromagnetism, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of wave propagation.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Suppose you know the phase of a wave is given by

<br /> \phi_1 = \vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t.<br />

How can you determine in which direction this wave is propagating? I guess, more specifically, how does a wave described by this phase differ from a wave described by the phase

<br /> \phi_2 = \vec k \cdot \vec r + \omega t<br />

I may not have provided enough detail...please tell me if I haven't! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(I was always under the impression that it was the wave vector \vec k that carried the information about which way the wave was propagating, but recent discussions in my E&M class have caused me to question this belief.)
 
You first need to define your time progression. If your standard is good ole e^{-i\omega t}, then the phase dependence is given by:

\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}-\omega t

The wave propogates in the \hat{k} direction. If you have

\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}-\omega t

as your phase progression then you must have changed your time convention to e^{i\omega t} or you are missing a minus sign here where the actual dependence is e^{-\phi_2} in which case we are progressing in the -\hat{k} direction, but this information is not given in what you have.
 
Take r vector to be in the direction of k vector.
Now, take kx-wt=A (some constant phase) and differentiate it with respect to t . you get dx/dt=w/k which is the velocity of the point whose A(phase) is constant, and hence velocity of wave . It is called phase velocity. Direction of the propagation is the direction of k vector.

http://www.actionurl.com/jpxp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K