Determining if logical matrix represents a partial order

  • Thread starter Thread starter sciencectn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Partial
sciencectn
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
If we represent a relation using a logical matrix (so that if (a,b) is present in the relation then the element at row a and column b in the matrix is a 1), is there any way to determine that this matrix represents a partial order using matrix operations?

For example, if we have the relation {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2)} represented by this matrix:

<br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right)<br />

Is there some way, using matrix operations, to determine if this represents a partial order?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Actually, yes. This is a convenient way. For instance, see Mathematics of Fuzziness -- Basic Issues by Xuzhu Wang, Da Raun and Etienne E. Kerre.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
960
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top