Determining possible trajectories (Classical Mechanics)

MrCreamer
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine possible trajectories for particle with constant magnitude of velocity |\dot{\vec{r}}| = v0 and constant angular momentum \vec{L} = \vec{L}0

Homework Equations



|\dot{\vec{r}}| = v0
\vec{L} = \vec{L}0

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that L dot is zero and thereby the torque is zero. My intuition tells me that the possibly trajectories would be circles but mathematically, I am not sure where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at he definition of L. Perhaps the time derivative of that tells you something
 
Well, as I said, if \dot{\vec{L}} = 0, then the net torque and net force are zero. The constant velocity magnitude implies that the direction of the velocity vector can change but the speed would remain constant.

If F is zero, then you have

m\ddot{x} = 0

Which implies that x(t) is of some linear form:

x(t) = at + b, where a = v_{0} and b = x_{0}.

I'm assuming the question requires the graphing of the trajectories in phase space and hence would require some form of mathematical development in terms of the energy of the system.
 
I think BvU meant for you to differentiate ##\vec{L} = \vec{r}\times\vec{F}## and to interpret the result.

By the way, your inference that ##\dot{\vec{L}} = 0## implies ##\vec{F}=0## is not correct.
 
I meant: differentiate ##\vec L = \vec r \times \vec p## wrt time, knowing ##\vec p = m\dot{\vec r}##. Don't venture into x and y because you have everything you need in polar coordinates.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top