Determining & Proving Inverse Functions: Methodology?

jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50
Does anyone know of an existing methodology for determining and proving whether or not a function has an inverse?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How about by determining if the function is a bijection? Or am I missing something here?
 
The "horizontal line test". How many times does any horizontal line cross the graph of the function? Which is the same as "determining if the function is a bijection"!
 
Thank you very much. Just a brief follow up question: Suppose a function is invertable but the inverse has no representation in terms of elementary functions (I'm including trigonometric and logarithmic functions in this category) - I think f(x) = x + sin(x) would meet this criterion - is there a general method for proving that the function does not have an inverse expressable in terms of elementary functions?

Sorry if that doesn't make sense.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top