Determining the Minimum Force to Push a Crate

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum force required to push a crate on a horizontal surface, considering the effects of static friction and the angle of applied force. The problem involves understanding the relationship between the applied force, the weight of the crate, and the normal force.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the applied force and static friction, questioning the use of weight versus mass in calculations. There is discussion about how the angle of the applied force affects the normal force and, consequently, the frictional force.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying definitions and questioning assumptions about the variables involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the forces at play, particularly the distinction between weight and mass.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted potential confusion regarding the use of symbols for weight and mass, which may affect the understanding of the problem. Participants are also considering how the angle of the applied force influences the normal force and static friction.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
You try to push a crate of weight M with a force F on a horizontal floor. The
coefficient of static friction is μs, and you exert the force F under an angle φ below the
horizontal.
Determine the minimum value of F that will move the crate.

Okay so basically what i did was equate Mμs=Fcos φ and evaluate for F. however the answer my teacher gave me is slightly different. He use Nμs=Fcos φand he found N by evaluating the forces in the y component. So the question is why can't i just equate the force applied with the static friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semc said:
You try to push a crate of weight M with a force F on a horizontal floor. The
coefficient of static friction is μs, and you exert the force F under an angle φ below the
horizontal.
Determine the minimum value of F that will move the crate.

Okay so basically what i did was equate Mμs=Fcos φ and evaluate for F. however the answer my teacher gave me is slightly different. He use Nμs=Fcos φand he found N by evaluating the forces in the y component. So the question is why can't i just equate the force applied with the static friction?

Does your M stand for mass? If so your units will come out wrong for force.
If one pushes (y-component) down on a mass sitting on a surface then the Normal force is going to be different compared to the same mass pushed on perfectly horizontally, or the mass pushed up. So in your problem you are pushing horizontally and vertically.
 
pgardn said:
Does your M stand for mass? If so your units will come out wrong for force.
If one pushes (y-component) down on a mass sitting on a surface then the Normal force is going to be different compared to the same mass pushed on perfectly horizontally, or the mass pushed up. So in your problem you are pushing horizontally and vertically.

His M is weight, not mass, so unit-wise it works.

But the problem is just as you've pointed out.

The definition of the kinetic frictional force is: [tex]f_{s max}=\mu_s N[/tex] and NOT: [tex]f_{s max}\neq \mu_s W[/tex]

By pushing up on the mass, you're decreasing the normal force from the ground, thereby decreasing the friction force, and making life easier for yourself.
 
Last edited:
RoyalCat said:
His M is weight, not mass, so unit-wise it works.

But the problem is just as you've pointed out.

The definition of the kinetic frictional force is: [tex]f_{s max}=\mu_s N[/tex] and NOT: [tex]f_{s max}\neq \mu_s W[/tex]

By pushing up on the mass, you're decreasing the normal force from the ground, thereby decreasing the friction force, and making life easier for yourself.

Oops my bad as they say.

That is a really a potentially confusing symbol to use for weight...
 

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K