Determining Time Invariance in Signal Statements: Examples and Solutions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining time invariance in signal statements, specifically analyzing examples provided by a professor. The first example, x(-t) = y(t) with an input of x(t-T), leads to confusion about whether the shift in input affects the output's time invariance. The participant's interpretation suggests a leftward shift in input results in a rightward shift in output, indicating non-invariance, while the professor's solution implies a different interpretation. The second example, x(at) = y(t) with the same input, also leads to a conclusion of non-invariance based on the participant's calculations. Overall, the participant questions the clarity and consistency of the professor's instructions regarding time invariance.
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I just have a general question about what one of my professors had written on the board today in class.

He was writing down examples where we had to determine whether the given statement was time invariant or not.

One example was written as follows,

x(-t) = y(t)

\text{Input: }x(t-T)

My attempt at solving this would be,

x(-(t-T)) = x(T-t) = y(t-T)

Thus a leftward shift in the input causes a rightward shift in the output. Therefore not time invariant.

The solution my professor proposed was something like the following

x(-t -T) = x(-(t+T)) = y(t-T)

I can't quite remember what he wrote on the RHS of the equation but it was something like that.

Am I misinterpreting what he means by,

\text{Input: }x(t-T)

Is he just saying, check if its time invariant when the input is shifted to the right by T?

Another example he gave was,

x(at) = y(t)

\text{Input: }x(t-T)

My attempt at the solution would be,

x(a(t-T)) = x(at-aT) = y(t-T)

A shift by aT ≠ a shift by T therefore not time invariant.

His solution,

x(at-T) = x(a(t-\frac{T}{a}))

Therefore not invariant.

Am I misinterpreting what he is saying what when he writes,

\text{Input: x(t-T)}

?

Should it be written that way in the first place? Is what he is writing and what he wants from us inconsistent?

Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump, anyone!?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K