Time Variant System: y(t) = x(-t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaus tail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the system defined by the equation y(t) = x(-t) is time variant or time invariant. Participants explore this question through examples and reasoning, focusing on the application of delays to the input and output of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that by applying a delay to the input and comparing outputs, they find that y(1) = 3 and y(2) = 2 yield the same results, suggesting the system is time invariant.
  • Others argue that the outputs differ when applying the system to delayed inputs, indicating that the system is time variant, as demonstrated by comparing rows in their examples.
  • A later reply questions the logic of the initial reasoning and suggests writing out sequences step by step to clarify the comparison between Y1 and Y2.
  • Some participants express confusion about the application of the minus sign in the equation and how it affects the system's behavior.
  • One participant mentions that the coursework requires a specific method of replacing t with t-t0, which adds to the complexity of understanding the system's time variance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the system is time invariant or time variant, with multiple competing views remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions and implications of time variance in this context, as well as the specific method required by their coursework. There are unresolved questions about how the minus sign in the equation influences the system's classification.

jaus tail
Messages
613
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


Is the system: y(t) = x(-t) time variant or time invariant?

Homework Equations


Condition for time invariant:
1) Apply delay to input and check output as Y1
2) Apply input to system without delay and apply delay to output and name it as Y2

If Y1 = Y2, system is Time invariant.

The Attempt at a Solution



We have y(t) = x(-t)
So I tried with example:
T -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
x(t) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
y(t) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

At time t = 2
First apply delay to input.
Delay of 1
So time becomes 1
x(1) = 5
y(1) = x(-1) = 3-----equation 1

Now at time t = 2
Apply this to system
y(2) = x(-2) = 2
Apply delay of 1
y(1) = 3-----equation 2

Equation 1 and equation 2 are same.
So this is time invariant.
Book says it's time variant equation.
How?

upload_2018-2-6_11-45-51.png

If I go by red line (first delay and then system)
or if I go by blue line (first system and then delay) I get same answer,
so how is this time variant?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-6_11-45-51.png
    upload_2018-2-6_11-45-51.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 821
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jaus tail said:

Homework Statement


Is the system: y(t) = x(-t) time variant or time invariant?

Homework Equations


Condition for time invariant:
1) Apply delay to input and check output as Y1
2) Apply input to system without delay and apply delay to output and name it as Y2

If Y1 = Y2, system is Time invariant.

The Attempt at a Solution



We have y(t) = x(-t)
So I tried with example:
T -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
x(t) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
y(t) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

At time t = 2
First apply delay to input.
Delay of 1
So time becomes 1
x(1) = 5
y(1) = x(-1) = 3-----equation 1

Now at time t = 2
Apply this to system
y(2) = x(-2) = 2
Apply delay of 1
y(1) = 3-----equation 2

Equation 1 and equation 2 are same.
So this is time invariant.
Book says it's time variant equation.
How?

View attachment 219783
If I go by red line (first delay and then system)
or if I go by blue line (first system and then delay) I get same answer,
so how is this time variant?
I don't quite follow your logic with the red and blue arrows.

Instead, take a step back and write out the sequences, one by one. It's fine to start with your existing example sequences,

Code:
T       -3    -2     -1     0      1      2      3
x(t)     1     2      3     4      5      6      7
y(t)     7     6      5     4      3      2      1

Delay the "y(t)" above to obtain your Y2

Now write out x(t-1).

Then write out y(t-1) based on what you just did with x(t-1). From that you have your Y1.

At this point, compare your Y1 to Y2.
 
Okay. Let's take time = 3.
Apply x(3) to system.
We get output:
y(3) = 1
Delay it by 1 to get y(2) and we get 2.

Now delay time. So t = 3 - 1 = 2.
Apply x(2) to system and we get output:
y(2) = 2.
They still turn out to be same.
 
jaus tail said:
Okay. Let's take time = 3.
Apply x(3) to system.
We get output:
y(3) = 1
Delay it by 1 to get y(2) and we get 2.
I follow that so far.

Now delay time. So t = 3 - 1 = 2.
Apply x(2) to system and we get output:
y(2) = 2.
They still turn out to be same.

Now I'm a little lost. Perhaps start with this:
Code:
T      -3  -2  -1   0   1   2   3
x(t)    1   2   3   4   5   6   7
x(t-1)  0   1   2   3   4   5   6

Now what's y(t-1)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jaus tail
upload_2018-2-7_10-7-27.png

Is this right? I'm still not sure.
Row 4 and 6 are different so it's time variant.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-7_10-7-27.png
    upload_2018-2-7_10-7-27.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 828
jaus tail said:
View attachment 219860
Is this right? I'm still not sure.
Row 4 and 6 are different so it's time variant.
Yeah, I think that's the right idea. :smile:

(For what it's worth, I appreciate the confusion though. Personally, I think this problem is a little ambiguous in what is actually meant by "y(t) = x(-t)" and exactly how that is accomplished in the system. That said, demonstrating that rows 4 and 6 are different is probably what your instructor/coursework is expecting.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jaus tail
The coursework actually requires using x(t)--->y(t)---->y(t-to)
and then x(t)---> replace all t by t-t0 and then find out y(t-to)
Even google suggested replacing t by t-t0 in which I never understood how the minus sign spreads.
That's why I prefer the above method of making rows and columns.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K