Determining Time Invariance in Signal Statements: Examples and Solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining time invariance in signal statements, specifically examining examples provided by a professor. The first example, x(-t) = y(t) with an input of x(t-T), demonstrates that a leftward shift in the input results in a rightward shift in the output, confirming it is not time invariant. The second example, x(at) = y(t) with the same input, shows that a shift by aT does not equal a shift by T, thus also confirming non-invariance. The participant questions the clarity of the professor's notation and whether it accurately conveys the concept of time invariance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time invariance in signal processing
  • Familiarity with signal notation and transformations
  • Basic knowledge of linear systems theory
  • Experience with mathematical manipulation of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of time invariance in linear systems
  • Learn about signal transformations and their implications
  • Explore examples of time-invariant and time-variant systems
  • Review mathematical proofs related to signal invariance
USEFUL FOR

Students of signal processing, electrical engineering majors, and anyone studying linear systems who seeks to understand time invariance in signal statements.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I just have a general question about what one of my professors had written on the board today in class.

He was writing down examples where we had to determine whether the given statement was time invariant or not.

One example was written as follows,

x(-t) = y(t)

\text{Input: }x(t-T)

My attempt at solving this would be,

x(-(t-T)) = x(T-t) = y(t-T)

Thus a leftward shift in the input causes a rightward shift in the output. Therefore not time invariant.

The solution my professor proposed was something like the following

x(-t -T) = x(-(t+T)) = y(t-T)

I can't quite remember what he wrote on the RHS of the equation but it was something like that.

Am I misinterpreting what he means by,

\text{Input: }x(t-T)

Is he just saying, check if its time invariant when the input is shifted to the right by T?

Another example he gave was,

x(at) = y(t)

\text{Input: }x(t-T)

My attempt at the solution would be,

x(a(t-T)) = x(at-aT) = y(t-T)

A shift by aT ≠ a shift by T therefore not time invariant.

His solution,

x(at-T) = x(a(t-\frac{T}{a}))

Therefore not invariant.

Am I misinterpreting what he is saying what when he writes,

\text{Input: x(t-T)}

?

Should it be written that way in the first place? Is what he is writing and what he wants from us inconsistent?

Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump, anyone!?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K