Did de Broglie err in his hypothesis?

  • I
  • Thread starter drl
  • Start date
  • #1
drl
31
1
I'm a novice in this so to start with, I believe ....
[mentor's note: a personal theory posted in violation of the Physics Forums rules has been removed from this post]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
138
42
Hi drl

I would recommend reading more into the subject and maybe reading some introductory text around quantum field theory. When electrons are described as Wave and Particle, they are simplifications that describe wave-like and particle-like behaviours, depending on how you are measuring the electron in any particular experiment; they aren't descriptions of an electron actually being a wave or a particle. If you study particle physics more deeply, you'll probably think of electrons (and in fact all particles) and not particles at all, but vibrations in a field. Analogies are really helpful to get concepts across and aid understanding, but they are also really dangerous and you won't be the first or last person to fall into the trap of taking them literally!.

Hope this helps
Matt
 
  • Like
Likes olgerm and bhobba
  • #3
9,559
2,631
De Broglie was wrong. His ideas were overthrown when the correct quantum theory was developed with Dirac's transformation theory of 1926:
http://www.lajpe.org/may08/09_Carlos_Madrid.pdf

So forget all the guff you have read elsewhere which I can see from the above has really confused you.

Here is the explanation of the double slit using just QM:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0703/0703126.pdf

Once you have studied that we can chat about what's really going on. But basically its due to the uncertainty principle and principle of superposition - not the wave-particle duality which is an idea of limited applicability at best and maybe even downright wrong:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and OCR
  • #4
138
42
Love that last link Bill - have downloaded it to read tomorrow (well... realistically over a number of tomorrows!) Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #5
9,559
2,631
Love that last link Bill - have downloaded it to read tomorrow (well... realistically over a number of tomorrows!)
Glad you like it.

Unfortunately we get a fair number of posters here confused by standard beginner treatments and you have to, sometimes, spend a bit of time explaining beginner texts have issues.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Nugatory
Mentor
13,116
5,888
Posts involving some basic misunderstandigns of the Physics Forums rules about personal theories have been removed.
This thread is closed.
 

Related Threads on Did de Broglie err in his hypothesis?

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
742
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
153
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
878
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
2K
Top