Did Hubble opine that the universe was expanding?

AI Thread Summary
Hubble's observations indicated that galaxies were moving away from each other, showing a correlation between distance and redshift, but he did not explicitly state that this meant the universe was expanding. Instead, he and Humason emphasized the empirical nature of their findings and left the interpretation to others. Hubble was cautious about concluding that his data suggested an expanding universe, often questioning but not entirely dismissing that idea throughout his life. The discussion highlights the distinction between Hubble's observations and the later interpretations that led to the concept of an expanding universe. Ultimately, Hubble's reluctance to assert an expanding universe reflects the complexity of interpreting early astronomical data.
CCWilson
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
When Hubble published that the galaxies were moving away from each other, the further away the greater redshift and the greater separation velocity, was he saying that space itself was expanding, on the basis of Einstein's general theory, or was he assuming a more or less fixed space, with everything in it retreating from everything else? In other words, did he come up with the idea of an expanding universe - as opposed to a fixed framework within which all the players were flying apart - or did someone else draw that conclusion as a result of his observations?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hubble and Humason did not say that redshifted “nebulae” were receding from us. They left the interpretation of their data to others. See this quotation:

“Mr. Humason and I are both deeply sensible of your gracious appreciation of the papers on velocities and distances of nebulae. We use the term ‘apparent’ velocities to emphasize the empirical features of the correlation. The interpretation, we feel, should be left to you and the very few others who are competent to discuss the matter with authority.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Hubble

One more example of historical evidence, written by Hubble himself, is here:
http://apod.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/d_1996/hub_1929.html
 
Yes, Hubble was reluctant to conclude his redshift studies suggested the universe was expanding. He questioned, but, never entirely rejected that interpretation for most of his life.
 
'Opine'? Man, somebody must have gotten a thesaurus for Christmas...
 
Admittedly, I am a logolept.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top