Stargazing Did I finally capture decent pictures of Mars and other celestial objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Pictures
AI Thread Summary
Decent pictures of Mars and other celestial objects were captured using a new piggyback rig, despite challenges like light pollution and humidity. The Andromeda galaxy appeared low contrast due to the near-full moon, prompting a need for enhancement techniques. Windy conditions affected detail capture on Mars, but tracking errors were minimal with the 135mm lens, allowing for usable long-exposure images. The equipment used includes a Meade ETX-105 telescope and a Meade Deep-Sky Imager camera, with some photos taken through a 135mm SLR lens. Overall, the results indicate progress in astrophotography skills and equipment use.
Messages
23,694
Reaction score
11,136
Busy night last night. I finally got some decent pictures of Mars, and with my new piggyback rig, I captured a bunch of open clusters and the Andromeda galaxy. With the moon near full and with a somewhat humid night and lots of light pollution, the Andromeda galaxy is pretty low contrast, but I need to learn some enhancement techniques anyway, so it's something to work on. It was also a little windy, so I'll be able to get more detail on Mars on a calmer night (and when it gets higher and closer). The tracking error is noticeable, but small enough with the 135mm lens that I don't have to throw away many of the long-exposure pics. Anyway, here they are:

The first three are the easy to recognize ones: M31, Mars, and the Pleaides. The number after the name is the exposure. The Mars photo is a stack of several hundred frames and the rest are several dozen.
 

Attachments

  • m31-45.jpg
    m31-45.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 561
  • Mars 005.jpg
    Mars 005.jpg
    2.1 KB · Views: 521
  • Pleaides-10.jpg
    Pleaides-10.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 478
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
These next two are the Perseus double-cluster and M-34.
 

Attachments

  • Perseus Double 20s.jpg
    Perseus Double 20s.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 505
  • m34-30.jpg
    m34-30.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 499
What telescope are you using russ, and how much is it?
 
The telescope is a Meade ETX-105 (~$800) and the camera is a Meade Deep-Sky Imager (~$300). Of the pictures in the last two posts, only the Mars pic was taken through the scope (and a 2x barlow lens: ~$50). The rest were taken through a 135mm SLR camera lens (~$40, used) piggy-back mounted to the scope and adapted to the DSI (see post #84). Page through the thread for more pics...
 
Last edited:
very nice . Thanks every one.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top