Did only parts of the diamond get entangled?

  • Thread starter Thread starter durant35
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entaglement
durant35
Messages
292
Reaction score
11
I decided to start a specific thread over this because I am interested in opinions of more expert members than me. In 2011. there was an experiment which entagled diamonds at room temperature. Here is the paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51855622_Entangling_Macroscopic_Diamonds_at_Room_Temperature

Now I did some research here on forum about it and some members said that the result is an exaggeration. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/a-classical-object-behaving-quantum.556018/

This is the math behind it which apparently shows that the phonon didn't spread so much to cover the whole diamonds.

1 fs (femtosecond) = 10-15s. Laser pulse duration = 100 fs Time between laser pulses = 350 fs. Speed of sound in diamond v ~ 12000 m/s. From this one easily can estimate how far a phonon can spread/propagate in 350 fs as dx = v*dt = 12000*350*10-15 = 4.2*10-8m = 4.2*10-5mm. Given the diamonds were each around 3mm in size, then if roughly cubic in shape, the fractional volume occupied by phonon at end of dual pulse run is of the order 4*pi/3*(4.2*10-5/3)3 ~ 10-14. So to say 'the diamonds' were in a state of superposition does indeed seem just a trifle exaggerated! The above assumes a classical spherical spreading pulse as 'phonon', but that is therefore probably a somewhat overestimate of volume occupied by excited material.Can anybody tell me is this accurate and did only parts the diamond got entagled? Thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi

This article http://www.nature.com/news/entangled-diamonds-vibrate-together-1.9532 should answer your second question.

"The researchers used a laser pulse to stimulate phonon vibrations in two crystals 3 millimetres wide and 15 centimetres apart. They say that each phonon involves the coherent vibration of about 10^16 atoms, corresponding to a region of the crystal about 0.05 millimetres wide and 0.25 millimetres long — large enough to see with the naked eye."
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
18K
Back
Top