Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Did WSU make FTL a Reality?

  1. May 21, 2017 #1
    While the title may seem to overblow it, showing that negative mass exists may be just that big.

    After all, as I understand, the primary obstacle to the reality of the Alcubierre Drive or Krasnikov Tubes is the negative energy density requirements. This of course violates certain energy conditions and allows for "ill-behaved" spacetimes.

    Is that what happened?

    Link to a media article on the WSU finding.

    I don't have access to the actual paper, but it's here.

    Does this allow for arbitrarily large negative energy densities over non-quantum volumes, or is there some kind of quantum "catch" to this that wouldn't make this suitable for breaking some of the energy conditions? Is WSU's negative-mass hydrogen that "exotic matter" that's needed, or am I missing something?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 21, 2017 #2

    Ibix

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The short version of this is "never trust a press release". See here for some discussion: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physicists-create-negative-mass.911744/

    It's a negative effective mass. If I understood @ZapperZ right, it's just Archimedes' principle. A helium balloon in air has a negative effective mass. Put one in a car and stamp on the accelerator and it will drift to the front of the car. But it still has a positive mass - it's not exotic matter.

    This is new in superfluid systems. Which is pretty cool in its own right, but not world changing to the extent the press release suggests.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2017
  4. May 21, 2017 #3

    bitstreamout

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Did WSU make FTL a Reality?
  1. FTL Possible? (Replies: 7)

  2. QFT and FTL (Replies: 4)

  3. Is FTL possible? (Replies: 27)

  4. FTL and causality (Replies: 10)

Loading...