Diff. Eq. Show that the following equation is not exact.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jtechguy21
  • Start date Start date
Jtechguy21
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the following equation is not exact.
Then find and simplify the integrating factor that makes the equation exact.(You do not have to solve the equation)

(Y^2 - x)dx + (4xy)dy=0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



M(x,y) =(Y^2 - x)dx N(x,y)=(4xy)dy

Partial Derivative of m with respect to y is 2y

Partial Derivative of N with respect to x is xy

^shows they are not exact.
how exactly do i find this integrating factor that makes them exact?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jtechguy21 said:

Homework Statement



Show that the following equation is not exact.
Then find and simplify the integrating factor that makes the equation exact.(You do not have to solve the equation)

(Y^2 - x)dx + (4xy)dy=0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



M(x,y) =(Y^2 - x)dx N(x,y)=(4xy)dy

Partial Derivative of m with respect to y is 2y

Partial Derivative of N with respect to x is xy

^shows they are not exact.
how exactly do i find this integrating factor that makes them exact?

If your text doesn't tell you how, look here:

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/math/differential-equations/first-order-equations/integrating-factors
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
LCKurtz said:
If your text doesn't tell you how, look here:

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/math/differential-equations/first-order-equations/integrating-factors

yes! thank you so much. I figured it out with the link you gave me.
My integrating factor was x^-(1/2) yay :)
they are exact now.

I found it really strange my book does not show me how to find the IF for exact equations, and the homework examples already have the IF given. hmmm. anyways.

can you answer another question for me. In the link I used case 1. but i am unsure when i need to use case2. the conditions are nearly identical.

Consider the differential equation M dx + N dy = 0. If this equation is not exact, then M y will not equal N x ; that is, M y – N x ≠ 0. However, if

case1 is a function of x only
(My-Nx)/(N)

Case2 is a function of y only
(My-Nx)/(-M)
 
Last edited:
Jtechguy21 said:
yes! thank you so much. I figured it out with the link you gave me.
My integrating factor was x^-(1/2) yay :)
they are exact now.

I found it really strange my book does not show me how to find the IF for exact equations, and the homework examples already have the IF given. hmmm. anyways.

If the equation is exact so ##M_y=N_x##, you don't need an integrating factor. It's ready to go as it is.

can you answer another question for me. In the link I used case 1. but i am unsure when i need to use case2. the conditions are nearly identical.

Consider the differential equation M dx + N dy = 0. If this equation is not exact, then M y will not equal N x ; that is, M y – N x ≠ 0. However, if

case1 is a function of x only
(My-Nx)/(N)

Case2 is a function of y only
(My-Nx)/(-M)

You don't have a choice of which, if any, case to use. If you are lucky and get either the function of x or function of y in that test, you can find an integrating factor which will make the equation exact. But an equation might not be exact and neither of the above cases work either. Then you have to resort to other methods to solve it, presuming it can be solved analytically at all. These techniques don't always work.
 
LCKurtz said:
If the equation is exact so ##M_y=N_x##, you don't need an integrating factor. It's ready to go as it is.



You don't have a choice of which, if any, case to use. If you are lucky and get either the function of x or function of y in that test, you can find an integrating factor which will make the equation exact. But an equation might not be exact and neither of the above cases work either. Then you have to resort to other methods to solve it, presuming it can be solved analytically at all. These techniques don't always work.


thank you for explaining this to me :) It all makes sense to me now!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top