Diff forms, the dangers

  • Thread starter Tyger
  • Start date
398
0
When ever we find a new interaction that needs to be described we tend to model it on the most understood interaction, both theoretically and experimentally, namely Electrodynamics. But that has a hidden danger, and one element of that danger is differential forms. They are certainly very nifty in their working, and they make for neat concise equations. So how can they be dangerous?

First, Electromagnetism, as exemplified by Maxwell's Equations, is scale invariant. This is uaually stated by saying that the Photon has zero rest mass. More correctly, the virtual Photon can have any mass squared from a very high to a very low number, because in any practical apparatus many of the Photon events are virtual. If we build an electrical apparatus that is half or twice the size of another it will probably work just fine.

It is this very scale invariance that makes it possible to use diff forms to describe electromagnetism, but it is the ONLY interaction that is truly scale invariant. Gravity has a modified scale invariance, so they can be used with caution. But all the other interactions are short range, so we should expect that diff forms can not be applied to them, or if they are they will more likely increase the complexity of our equations because we will have to subtract out all the terms that are scale invariant in our description.

So my advice is use diff forms with caution and don't be too intranced by their neatness and concisenes. −
 
Last edited:

instanton

Originally posted by Tyger
When ever we find a new interaction that needs to be described we tend to model it on the most understood interaction, both theoretically and experimentally, namely Electrodynamics. But that has a hidden danger, and one element of that danger is differential forms. They are certainly very nifty in their working, and they make for neat concise equations. So how can they be dangerous?

First, Electromagnetism, as exemplified by Maxwell's Equations, is scale invariant. This is uaually stated by saying that the Photon has zero rest mass. More correctly, the virtual Photon can have any mass squared from a very high to a very low number, because in any practical apparatus many of the Photon events are virtual. If we build an electrical apparatus that is half or twice the size of another it will probably work just fine.

It is this very scale invariance that makes it possible to use diff forms to describe electromagnetism, but it is the ONLY interaction that is truly scale invariant. Gravity has a modified scale invariance, so they can be used with caution. But all the other interactions are short range, so we should expect that diff forms can not be applied to them, or if they are they will more likely increase the complexity of our equations because we will have to subtract out all the terms that are scale invariant in our description.

So my advice is use diff forms with caution and don't be too intranced by their neatness and concisenes. −
I don't quite get it. What is scale invariance have to do with differential forms?

Instanton
 

Related Threads for: Diff forms, the dangers

  • Posted
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
854
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
5K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top