I Difference Analysis and Calculus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the distinction between analysis and calculus, noting that calculus is often seen as foundational, focusing on derivatives and integrals, while analysis delves into more rigorous concepts, such as limits and infinitesimals. The terminology can vary by language, with some equating calculus with what English speakers consider analysis. The conversation highlights that there are no strict definitions, and the terms can be interchangeable based on the depth of study. Complex analysis is presented as an example of how calculus evolves into a more rigorous form when applied to complex functions. Ultimately, the differentiation between the two fields lies in the level of mathematical rigor and the concepts being examined.
ItsTheSebbe
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
I'm a bit torn on what the difference between analysis and calculus is, I read somewhere that calculus is pretty much analysis without proofs? Either way, I see a lot of people mention problems being on calculus 1 or 2 level. I have finished Analysis 1 and 2 and covered stuff like (series, ODE, multivariable functions, double integrals, Fourier series/transforms, Lagrange multipliers, etc), is that comparable to the calculus 1 and 2 I see mentioned so often?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I suspect that English speaking people may see it differently, but in my language, calculus is used in a completely different manner and is a general term for a framework, in which calculations can be done, such as logic, set theory or arithmetic. We call analysis, what in English is called calculus. So I wouldn't spent too much thoughts on what might be the difference.
 
There are no precise rules to define these terms. Usually at a college level, calculus is used for the beginning course (derivatives, integrals), while analysis refers to more advanced material based on calculus.
 
This is an opinionated response. I would say Analysis re-examines those things conceived in calculus that had not the precise notion of "infinitesimals" which is ultimately found in limits. If we hear the subjects "calculus" we immediately think of Newton, Leibniz, and other pioneers and we think of their naive notions of taking limits and of infinitesimals. The departure from the naeivity of this field to something mathematically kosher, vigorous, is I think the departure of calling something calculus and calling something analysis.

Take Complex Analysis for example. It comes out of a simple yet profound phenomena that occurs with complex numbers and functions of complex numbers into complex numbers. And that is degeneracy or multi-valuedness of complex functions. From this quality comes an entirely new kind of calculus. Then if we use the actual vigorous definition of limits used in calculus, this becomes less "naive" complex calculus and more "proper" complex calculus. It becomes complex analysis.

So those terms I feel are basically interchangeable depending on the depth of the inner working of the calculus one is going towards.
 
Personally I think of calculus as the study of differentiable functions and analysis as the study of measurable functions. You might separate probability theory as a third subject since it relies on the idea of independence while the rest of analysis does not.
 
5n+1 +7n+1

5n- 7n
solve this mathematical expression at limit tends to infinity
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top