Difference between color / temperature?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between a red object at room temperature and a heated red object, particularly focusing on the nature of color perception, electromagnetic spectra, and experimental observations related to color and temperature. The scope includes conceptual understanding and experimental analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the color red is perceived due to specific electromagnetic waves reflecting off objects, with different sources of these waves (e.g., heated metal vs. a flower).
  • Others argue that the spectra of a hot 'black body' and a pigment differ, with the former covering a broad range of wavelengths while the latter reflects a specific band of wavelengths.
  • A participant mentions that under certain conditions, the two red colors could be indistinguishable to the human eye, although infrared detection could differentiate them based on temperature.
  • One participant shares personal experimental findings, suggesting that a heated object can emit light in wavelengths not typically associated with its perceived color, such as green light from a red/orange hot stove burner.
  • Another participant discusses the challenges of conducting spectral analysis, emphasizing the need for controls and proper methodology to obtain meaningful results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of color and temperature, with no consensus reached on the implications of their findings or the conclusions drawn from the experiments. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of color perception and spectral analysis.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential biases in visual perception, the need for controlled experimental conditions, and the complexity of accurately measuring and interpreting spectral data.

revv
Messages
55
Reaction score
9
What is the difference between a red object at room temperature and a heated red object (Metal for example).

They are both red except one is cooler then the other?

Why aren't the red objects in my room not hot like the heating of a metal?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Red means some electromagnetic waves of a certain wavelength fall into your eyes. It does not allow to conclude, where those waves were created from. In case of a hot metal the source is the electrons of the heated metal atoms. In case of a red flower, it is the daylight minus all wavelengths which the flower absorbs, i.e. only red isn't absorbed but reflected. Now daylight comes from the sun, which is hot, too, only farther away. However, I suppose the creation process is a different one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, davenn, pinball1970 and 1 other person
revv said:
What is the difference between a red object at room temperature and a heated red object (Metal for example).
The spectra are different. For a hot 'black body' the spectrum covers the whole of the EM spectrum with a peak around the 'red' wavelengths and, for a pigment, the spectrum of reflected (white) light will be a band of wavelengths around the red wavelengths (depending on the quality of the pigment.
Our eyes are very poor spectrometers and, under the right viewing conditions, those two 'red' colours could be completely indistinguishable. We could possibly distinguish between two test objects by the fact that we could feel the IR wavelengths against our face and conclude the hot object is in fact hot but the cold red object is not. But the eyes would probably not help in deciding which is which.
If the EM from a red hot object were passed through a good red filter, the spectrum would be pretty much the same as when white light is passed through the filter because the black body spectrum is broad and doesn't change much over any chosen narrow band section.
 
sophiecentaur said:
For a hot 'black body' the spectrum covers the whole of the EM spectrum with a peak around the 'red' wavelengths
I proved to myself a couple of years ago that there is green light present in a red/orange hot electric stove burner. (≈1500°F / 800°C)

2016.12.03.red.hot.things.are.also.green.png

This image was taken through diffraction grating.

I also captured the fuzzy spectrum of the neon "On" lamp on the front of my stove, which is a different kind of "color" altogether. (I think. :biggrin:)
 

Attachments

  • 2016.12.03.red.hot.things.are.also.green.png
    2016.12.03.red.hot.things.are.also.green.png
    53.4 KB · Views: 655
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and russ_watters
revv said:
What is the difference between a red object at room temperature and a heated red object (Metal for example).

They are both red except one is cooler then the other?

Why aren't the red objects in my room not hot like the heating of a metal?
Oh my.
For several years I've been wanting to do a "spectral analysis" of a banana, to figure out if it's true that they aren't really yellow.
Your question finally prompted me to do the experiment.
Albeit, I used a lemon this morning, as, I kept eating my previous experimental subjects...

Anyways, here are the results of this morning's experiment:

Experimental apparatus:
2018.08.07.spectrometry.device.png



Subject of experiment:
2018.08.07.lemon.in.spectrometry.device.png


Results of experiment:
2018.08.07.spectral.analysis.of.a.lemon.png


Conclusion: Lemons are white? :oldconfused:

hmmmm...
 

Attachments

  • 2018.08.07.spectrometry.device.png
    2018.08.07.spectrometry.device.png
    102.4 KB · Views: 616
  • 2018.08.07.lemon.in.spectrometry.device.png
    2018.08.07.lemon.in.spectrometry.device.png
    67 KB · Views: 699
  • 2018.08.07.spectral.analysis.of.a.lemon.png
    2018.08.07.spectral.analysis.of.a.lemon.png
    57.8 KB · Views: 600
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Andy Resnick
OmCheeto said:
Conclusion: Lemons are white?
Conclusion: Eyeballing intensity levels at different frequencies and is not a good way to quantitatively measure a spectrum. The logarithmic response of the eyes will tend to make every frequency appear to be illuminated with rough uniformity.

Conclusion: Every experiment needs a control. If you look at the spectrum for an apple, or a piece of white paper compare it to one for a lemon and fail to find a difference then you have a real problem with your methodology. If you do find a difference, now you're getting a meaningful result. Side by side recommended -- eyes are designed to detect differences in illumination, edges.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
OmCheeto said:
Conclusion: Lemons are white?
Run the eye dropper sample tool on your Photo processing program and notice the RGB values on the image. There may be a Luminance option button - or convert to monochrome. That will show you a difference when compared to a white card (in shadow to avoid 255 255 255 saturation)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K