Difference between Hamiltonian operator and Total energy operator?

annms
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
What is the difference between the Hamiltonian operator and the Total energy operator? If both is used when working with total energy, why are there two different operators?
 
  • Like
Likes arpon
Physics news on Phys.org
They are both sides to the same equation. Hamiltonian = H and total energy = E.
H \psi = E \psi
 
annms said:
What is the difference between the Hamiltonian operator and the Total energy operator? If both is used when working with total energy, why are there two different operators?

As far as I am aware, they are one and the same. What was the context that led you to think they might be different?
 
Thank you for the responses guys. Forgive me for asking such a stupid question, I am a newbie to quantum mechanics. I was just reading my textbook and it first listed the total energy operator, then a few pages later it listed the Hamiltonian operator. It just looked very different than the total energy operator to me so I guess I was confused. Thanks again for the responses.
 
In the time-dependent Schrodinger Equation (ih ∂/∂t) ψ = H ψ, people sometimes mistakenly refer to the left hand side ih ∂/∂t as the energy operator. It is not, of course, it merely describes how ψ(x, t) evolves with time. It does not appear in the time-independent Schrodinger equation H ψ = E ψ, and it appears but has a different meaning in other "pictures", e.g. the Heisenberg picture in which (ih ∂/∂t) ψ = 0 and the time evolution is cast onto the operators themselves, or the interaction picture in which (ih ∂/∂t) ψ = Hint ψ where Hint is the interaction Hamiltonian.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top