Difference between ionization energy and photoelectric effect?

waterboy1234
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey there, I am just school student and is a little bit confused with this quantum physics question. what is the difference between ionization energy and photoelectric emission? is the difference just that ionization energy is an electron removed from an atom in its gaseous state while that of photoelectric effect is the removal of an electron from that of an element in its solid state? or is there more to it?

ok or rather, the difference between ionization energy and work function of a material?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
waterboy1234 said:
hey there, I am just school student and is a little bit confused with this quantum physics question. what is the difference between ionization energy and photoelectric emission? is the difference just that ionization energy is an electron removed from an atom in its gaseous state while that of photoelectric effect is the removal of an electron from that of an element in its solid state? or is there more to it?
no, there's not much more to it that that.
 
Ionization energy is defined as the energy needed to remove an electron from an isolated atom. I think the term usually gets associated with gases because, experimentally speaking, you could measure ionization energy from a gas since the atomic spacing is huge compared to the atoms themselves. If you have a lot of atoms close together (like in a solid), they do not behave as individual atoms because the energy levels merge etc. and a lot of other fun things happen so you can't, at least experimentally, associate ionization energy with a solid.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top