Difference between Optical bandpass filter and normal/electrical bandpass filter

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between optical bandpass filters and traditional electrical bandpass filters, focusing on their structures, functions, and mathematical representations. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of both types of filters, including their applications in circuits and optical networks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe optical bandpass filters as multilayer thin films that function similarly to microwave circuits rather than traditional lumped element filters.
  • One participant notes that optical filters have an infinite number of poles, contrasting with circuit-based filters that have one pole per lumped element.
  • There is a discussion about the difficulty of deriving the transfer function for optical bandpass filters compared to electrical filters, which can be derived from capacitors, resistors, and inductors.
  • Some participants suggest that interference filters operate based on time-domain characteristics, while others argue that this analogy may not hold true as both types of filters can be analyzed in frequency domain.
  • One participant emphasizes that optical filters can be understood as sections of cascaded transmission lines, where the inductance and capacitance are distributed along the length of the transmission line rather than being lumped.
  • There is a mention of the limitations in designing thin-film optical filters, which primarily use two materials (TiO2 and SiO2) and have restricted design parameters compared to microwave circuits.
  • Participants discuss the role of time delays in interference filters and how they relate to the perception of color, with differing opinions on whether time-domain or frequency-domain analysis is more appropriate for understanding these filters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of optical filters and their comparison to electrical filters. There is no consensus on the best approach to analyze these filters, with some favoring time-domain perspectives while others advocate for frequency-domain analysis. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal methods for deriving transfer functions for optical filters.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of deriving transfer functions for optical filters and the mathematical challenges involved. There are also references to the limitations of materials used in thin-film optical filters and the optimization processes that may lack analytical foundations.

thavamaran
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I am very new to optical domain, and I am only used to the common bandpass filter that we use on circuits, those RLC and OP-AMP based bandpass filter.

I went through few books and can't really find the difference, do anyone have any link regarding this issue or idea about this.

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Optical bandpass filters are multilayer thin films. You can treat this like a set of short transmission line sections of alternating admittance. This is more like a microwave circuit than a lumped element filter. It has an infinite number of poles unlike a circuit-based filter which has one pole per lumped element.
 
Optical bandpass filters are multilayer thin films. You can treat this like a set of short transmission line sections of alternating admittance. This is more like a microwave circuit than a lumped element filter. It has an infinite number of poles unlike a circuit-based filter which has one pole per lumped element.

Im still in the stage of simulating the filter, the problem here is, i need the transfer function of a optical bandpass filter in order to simulate the entire channel of optical network.

But then, normal circuity filters transfer function could be derived by considering capacitors and resistors and inductors. But in optical case, how do we get them. I went through a few papers, but yet i can't get the idea.
 
There are many hits on Google if you type in "interference filters". They are a form of transversal filter, working essentially in the time domain and the characteristic is not too hard to determine - see the more learned of the links for the formulae.
 
sophiecentaur said:
There are many hits on Google if you type in "interference filters". They are a form of transversal filter, working essentially in the time domain and the characteristic is not too hard to determine - see the more learned of the links for the formulae.

This is not quite right. Optical filters do not work in thetooke domain any more than circuits do.

They are microwave circuits, not lumped circuits. That means they are sections of cascaded transmission lines, not capacitors and inductors.
 
Antiphon said:
This is not quite right. Optical filters do not work in thetooke domain any more than circuits do.

They are microwave circuits, not lumped circuits. That means they are sections of cascaded transmission lines, not capacitors and inductors.
Yes, they are (like?) some microwave circuits.
I should, perhaps, have said that, as they are transversal filters, they are easier to analyse (and certainly easier to visualise) in the time domain - as are many microwave transmission filters. I realize it all boils down to the same thing in the end but it is often easier to look at some things from one point of view than another.
If you were to try to appreciate the behaviour of an oil film in the frequency domain, you would have difficulty. As a simple example of interference, based on path length difference (i.e. time difference), it is very easy to comprehend.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Yes, they are (like?) some microwave circuits.
I should, perhaps, have said that, as they are transversal filters, they are easier to analyse (and certainly easier to visualise) in the time domain - as are many microwave transmission filters. I realize it all boils down to the same thing in the end but it is often easier to look at some things from one point of view than another.
If you were to try to appreciate the behaviour of an oil film in the frequency domain, you would have difficulty. As a simple example of interference, based on path length difference (i.e. time difference), it is very easy to comprehend.

Sometimes I have to be very abbreviated when I'm on a tiny mobile keyboard. You are right, they are like microwave circuits. Properly speaking they are one-dimnsional optical waveguides. By calling them microwave circuits I meant they can be understood (and analyzed) mathematically as sections of transmission lines cascaded together and these are the same equations used to design micrwave circuit filters. In these types of filters, there are no inductors or capacitors. The inductance and capacitance is disrtibuted along the length of the transmission line section. Over a narrow frequency range you can make a mathematical transformation that makes them look like inductors and capacitors. You can then use some standard circuit filter ideas and then transform back to get the necessary transmission line parameters like length and characteristic impedance.


Where the multilayer filters are different than the usual microwave designs is that in almost all microwave circuits you are free to choose the impedance and length of the casscaded sections. Usually the sections are all the same electrical length (1/4 or 1/2 the center wavelength) but have a varying impedance profile. There are design tables for creating any type of bandpass profile you want to by connecting these transmission line sections.

By contrast the thin-film optical filters are limited to a certain set of materials (for economical designs anyway) and the only free design parameter is the thickness of each section. Most filter are produced using only two types of material, usually TiO2 and Sio2. This would be like designing filters using only two types of transmission lines but allowing the lengths to vary. While it can be done, there are very few design rules available for how to synthesize the filter. Most designs are numerically optimized with no analytical foundation whatever.

As for the time domain, I must disagree with you. How does the time domain help you visualize that the oil film will look say green and not red? The frequncy domain is much more nautral for this because you can envision green light being a wavelength match to the sizes of the layers and passing through while other wavelengths are reflected. The time-domain thinking allows you to see time delays and reflections very well, but not spectra which is how colors are best thought about.

FGor the OP, you need the transfer function of a transmission line. It involves the tangent function and can be either capacitive or inductive depending on the electrical size. If you really want to know how to do this, I can find you some references. The math is involved but not really difficult.
 
Interference filters work on differences in transit times. When the time / path differences are appropriate, you get cancellation or addition of reflections. If you have a quarter wave thick layer the delay both ways will cause a canceled reflection. This, of course, corresponds to a particular frequency but the thing works due to time delays. A lumped component circuit doesn't work in a way that is so obviously 'temporal'. That is all I was getting at.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K