Difference between R[[X]] and R[x]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Applejacks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary
R[[X]] represents formal power series with potentially infinitely many non-zero coefficients, while R[X] consists of polynomials with finitely many non-zero coefficients. Examples provided include 1+x and 3+2x+x^3, both of which are in R[X]. The series f(X)=∑(n=0 to ∞) (X^n/n!) is in R[[X]] but not in R[X], illustrating the distinction between the two. The discussion emphasizes that in R[[X]], convergence is irrelevant, allowing series like ∑(n=0 to ∞) n!X^n to be valid elements. Understanding these differences is crucial for working with formal power series and polynomials.
Applejacks
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Not so much a question. Rather, I don't quite understand the concept.

R[[X]] is the formal power series a0 + a1x + a2x^2...
R[X] consists of all elements in R[[X]] which have only finitely many non-zero coefficients.


Can someone give me an example? Would, say, two different elements of R[[X]] be 1+x and 3+2x+x^3 and hence both of these polynomials would be in R[X]? When does R[[X]] ever have infinitely many non-zero coefficients?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about something like
$$f(X)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{X^n}{n!}?$$ It would be an element of R[[X]] but not R[X] as it's clearly not a polynomial.
 
Ok that clears it up. I wasn't too sure if we could take a formal power series to n=infinity, which leads me to another question. If the n! was in the numerator instead, for the example you provided,would we get the same result (element of R[[X]] but not R[X])?
 
Applejacks said:
Ok that clears it up. I wasn't too sure if we could take a formal power series to n=infinity, which leads me to another question. If the n! was in the numerator instead, for the example you provided,would we get the same result (element of R[[X]] but not R[X])?

Yes. They are only formal power series. When looking at R[[X]], we do not care about convergence. So \sum n!X^n is a perfectly valid element of R[[X]].
 
One interesting feature is that (1 - X)^{-1} is an element of R[[x]]. In particular,

(1 - X)^{-1} = 1 + X + X^2 + X^3 + X^4 + \cdots = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} X^i

You can check this fact by multiplying the right hand side by 1-X.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
864
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K