Difference between R[[X]] and R[x]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Applejacks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between the formal power series ring R[[X]] and the polynomial ring R[X]. Participants explore the definitions and characteristics of these mathematical structures.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants provide definitions and examples of elements in R[[X]] and R[X], questioning the nature of coefficients and the implications of infinite series. They explore specific examples to illustrate their points, such as the series involving factorials.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants clarifying concepts and providing examples. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of formal power series and their independence from convergence considerations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the implications of infinite coefficients in formal power series and the conditions under which elements belong to R[[X]] versus R[X].

Applejacks
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Not so much a question. Rather, I don't quite understand the concept.

R[[X]] is the formal power series a0 + a1x + a2x^2...
R[X] consists of all elements in R[[X]] which have only finitely many non-zero coefficients.


Can someone give me an example? Would, say, two different elements of R[[X]] be 1+x and 3+2x+x^3 and hence both of these polynomials would be in R[X]? When does R[[X]] ever have infinitely many non-zero coefficients?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about something like
$$f(X)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{X^n}{n!}?$$ It would be an element of R[[X]] but not R[X] as it's clearly not a polynomial.
 
Ok that clears it up. I wasn't too sure if we could take a formal power series to n=infinity, which leads me to another question. If the n! was in the numerator instead, for the example you provided,would we get the same result (element of R[[X]] but not R[X])?
 
Applejacks said:
Ok that clears it up. I wasn't too sure if we could take a formal power series to n=infinity, which leads me to another question. If the n! was in the numerator instead, for the example you provided,would we get the same result (element of R[[X]] but not R[X])?

Yes. They are only formal power series. When looking at R[[X]], we do not care about convergence. So \sum n!X^n is a perfectly valid element of R[[X]].
 
One interesting feature is that (1 - X)^{-1} is an element of R[[x]]. In particular,

(1 - X)^{-1} = 1 + X + X^2 + X^3 + X^4 + \cdots = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} X^i

You can check this fact by multiplying the right hand side by 1-X.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K