Difference between the movement of oxygen ions and vacancies

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between the movement of oxygen ions and oxygen vacancies in solid oxides. It establishes that while both entities are involved in diffusion processes, their concentrations and mechanisms of movement differ significantly. Specifically, oxygen ions, which are negatively charged, can diffuse through various mechanisms, including interstitial diffusion, whereas oxygen vacancies, which represent missing lattice oxygen atoms, have a lower concentration and distinct diffusion coefficients. This difference in mobility is crucial for understanding ionic conductivity in materials like SiO2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ionic conductivity in solid oxides
  • Familiarity with crystal lattice structures
  • Knowledge of diffusion mechanisms in materials science
  • Basic principles of charge carriers in ionic compounds
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of ionic diffusion in solid oxides
  • Study the role of vacancies in ionic conductivity
  • Explore the properties of SiO2 and its applications in materials science
  • Learn about the diffusion coefficients of ions and vacancies in various materials
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, solid-state chemists, and researchers focused on ionic conductivity and diffusion mechanisms in solid oxides will benefit from this discussion.

Seeker87
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am confused about the difference (if there is any?) between the movement of oxygen ions and oxygen vacancies inside the solid oxides. In some literature I find they are taking about the movement of negatively charged oxygen ions inside the metal oxides, while in some other cases it is positively charged oxygen vacancies that move.

Is this the same thing? In crystals I imagine the oxygen vacancy as the vacancy of the lattice oxygen atom (for example in the case of SiO2 the missing oxygen atom between the two silicon atoms). Now the oxygen vacancy is a virtual particle and in reality it is always oxygen that moves. So is there any difference between the two (movement of oxygen vacancies and oxygen ions) in terms of mobility or similar?

Thanks a lot!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Seeker87 said:
. So is there any difference between the two (movement of oxygen vacancies and oxygen ions) in terms of mobility or similar?

First the concentration of vacancies is usually less than the concentration of oxide ions. Second the oxide ion can diffuse by other mechanisms other than the vacancy (interstitial for example). Because of this the diffusion coefficient of both the ion and the vacancy are different.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
27K