Difference between Vav and Vrms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the difference between average voltage (Vav) and root mean square voltage (Vrms) in the context of electromagnetic induction. A coil with 50 turns and an area of 0.02 m² is rotated in a 0.4 T magnetic field at 60 Hz, generating an average power of 50 W. The calculated resistance using the formula E = dΦb/dt resulted in 184Ω, while the correct resistance is 227Ω, highlighting the importance of using the correct formulas for Vav and Vrms. The discussion emphasizes that Vav over a full cycle is zero, and integrating the square of the voltage over time is necessary to determine energy accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction
  • Knowledge of sinusoidal functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with power calculations in electrical circuits
  • Basic calculus for integrating functions over time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Faraday's Law in electromagnetic systems
  • Learn about the differences between average voltage (Vav) and root mean square voltage (Vrms)
  • Explore the integration of sinusoidal functions to calculate energy in AC circuits
  • Investigate the impact of coil parameters on induced voltage and resistance
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or electrical engineering, educators teaching electromagnetic theory, and professionals working with AC circuits and electromagnetic systems.

Timothy Teo
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[/B]
I encountered this problem during my exam. A coil of 50 turns, each with area 0.02m2 is rotated in a uniform magnetic field of magnitude 0.4T. The coil is rotated at a frequency of 60Hz. Given the average power generated is 50W, what is the resistance of the wire?

Homework Equations


[/B]
E = dΦb/dt
P = E2/R

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
E = dNBA/dt = 50*0.4*0.02/(1/60*1/4) = 96V

(1/60 * 1/4 is the time taken when magnetic flux through the coil is max to zero)

R = 962/50 = 184Ω

However, the correct answer is 227Ω. As the prof had another class to teach, i could not ask him about it. My friend who got the answer said to use another formula: E = ωBAsinωt because Vav is different from Vrms.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Timothy Teo said:
because Vav is different from Vrms.
Quite so. In fact, you did not really calculate Vav. You only considered the change in area over one quarter cycle. Had you done the same calculation over a full cycle you would have got zero.

The energy in each interval dt is V2dt/R, so that is what needs to be integrated.
 
haruspex said:
The energy in each interval dt is V2dt/R, so that is what needs to be integrated.

if i calculate the change in flux over 1/4 cycle and divide by 1/4 of the period, don't i get Vav?
 
Timothy Teo said:
if i calculate the change in flux over 1/4 cycle and divide by 1/4 of the period, don't i get Vav?
No. As already stated, Vav = 0.
 
Timothy Teo said:
if i calculate the change in flux over 1/4 cycle and divide by 1/4 of the period, don't i get Vav?
You do get some kind of average voltage, but it is not of any great interest. The value will depend on which quarter cycle. E.g. try the quarter cycle from -π/8 to +3π/8. And it will tell you nothing about the average power.
 
Orodruin said:
No. As already stated, Vav = 0.
Vav over the whole cycle is 0, that i understand. Then what exactly have i calculated?
 
haruspex said:
You do get some kind of average voltage, but it is not of any great interest.
Because V is a sinusoidal function, each of the 4 quarters have the same area right? So if i integrate each quarter individually i should be able to get V over the whole cycle?
 
Timothy Teo said:
Because V is a sinusoidal function, each of the 4 quarters have the same area right? So if i integrate each quarter individually i should be able to get V over the whole cycle?
Yes, but for half the cycle V is negative. You could take the absolute value, but as I posted it is not very meaningful. The energy over the whole cycle is ##\int_0^T \frac{V(t)^2}R.dt##, not ##\frac{(\int_0^T |V(t)|.dt)^2}{TR}##,
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Timothy Teo

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K